Hi Will,
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:35:52 +0100 Will Deacon wrote:
>
> Just to say that, since the ACPI support code for arm64 was merged in the
> recent merge window, this branch is no longer required and can be dropped
> from linux-next.
Thanks for letting me know. I have removed it.
--
Cheers,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:10:55AM +, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Will,
Hi again Stephen,
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:20:03 + Will Deacon wrote:
> >
> > We've got a series of patches introducing ACPI support for arm64 that
> > are tentatively targetting the 4.1 merge window. Whilst there a
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:10:55AM +, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:20:03 + Will Deacon wrote:
> > We've got a series of patches introducing ACPI support for arm64 that
> > are tentatively targetting the 4.1 merge window. Whilst there are
> > face-to-face discussions set
Hi Will,
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:20:03 + Will Deacon wrote:
>
> We've got a series of patches introducing ACPI support for arm64 that
> are tentatively targetting the 4.1 merge window. Whilst there are
> face-to-face discussions set to happen in the next day or so around this
> topic, could yo
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 05:20:03PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> We've got a series of patches introducing ACPI support for arm64 that
Oh dear ARM comrades-in-arms, I was hearing rumours and was secretly
hoping that you would stay sane and not do the colossal mistake x86 did.
My co
Hi Stephen,
We've got a series of patches introducing ACPI support for arm64 that
are tentatively targetting the 4.1 merge window. Whilst there are
face-to-face discussions set to happen in the next day or so around this
topic, could you please pull this into linux-next under the assumption
that w
6 matches
Mail list logo
