On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 05:34:17PM +0200, pet...@infradead.org wrote:
>
> (your mailer broke and forgot to keep lines shorter than 78 chars)
I manually reordered the lines and that's indeed quite a mess :o)
>
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:46:41PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > == TIF_N
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 01:47:40PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:46:41PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm currently working on making nohz_full/nohz_idle runtime toggable
> > and some other people seem to be interested as well. So I've dumped
> >
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:52:00PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 02:36:36PM -0400, Phil Auld wrote:
> > exclusive cpusets is used now to control scheduler load balancing on
> > a group of cpus. It seems to me that this is the same idea and is part
> > of the isolation con
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:23:59PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:46:41PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > == Unbound affinity ==
> >
> > Restore kernel threads, workqueue, timers, etc... wide affinity. But take
> > care of cpumasks that have been set through othe
(your mailer broke and forgot to keep lines shorter than 78 chars)
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:46:41PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> == TIF_NOHZ ==
>
> Need to get rid of that in order not to trigger syscall slowpath on
> CPUs that don't want nohz_full. Also we don't want to iterate all
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:46:41PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently working on making nohz_full/nohz_idle runtime toggable
> and some other people seem to be interested as well. So I've dumped
> a few thoughts about some pre-requirements to achieve that for those
> interes
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 02:36:36PM -0400, Phil Auld wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:30:15PM -0300 Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:23:59PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:46:41PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Hi Fr
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:30:15PM -0300 Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:23:59PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:46:41PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > Hi Frederic,
> >
> > Thanks for the summary! Looking forward to your commen
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:23:59PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:46:41PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Frederic,
>
> Thanks for the summary! Looking forward to your comments...
>
> > I'm currently working on making nohz_full/nohz_idle runtime togga
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:46:41PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Frederic,
Thanks for the summary! Looking forward to your comments...
> I'm currently working on making nohz_full/nohz_idle runtime toggable
> and some other people seem to be interested as well. So I've dumped
> a few
Hi,
I'm currently working on making nohz_full/nohz_idle runtime toggable
and some other people seem to be interested as well. So I've dumped
a few thoughts about some pre-requirements to achieve that for those
interested.
As you can see, there is a bit of hard work in the way. I'm iterating
that
11 matches
Mail list logo
