Re: Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour.

2014-01-07 Thread Ove Karlsen
I am realizing that Linux-brats are vere very much like abusive mushroom users aren´t they. I did ressearch on this, and that is where I have seen that behaviour before. Obviously only having them in the environment is influental, as I doubt they all do mushrooms. This will be included on my

Re: Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour.

2014-01-07 Thread Ove Karlsen
And.. actually in commercial constructs one is also abused, but atleast one gets money. In open-source, or particulary Stallman idolaters, one is only abused. No limiter-awards, where technical excellence is recognized, because "the algorithm does this and that, and this is optimal". None of

Re: Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour.

2014-01-07 Thread Ove Karlsen
Just to be clear, no idolatry. At all. Anyways I am just going to use windows here, and maybe even get an E5 mac. It has logic audio, which I think is perfectly fine. I am almost nervous to contribute to this, seeing as much obscurity as it is. People will have to choose a solution good for

Re: Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour.

2014-01-07 Thread Ove Karlsen
On 1/7/2014 9:52 PM, Richard Dunn wrote: In case you missed it, Phoronix covered your original email. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=MTU1MTI Phoronix is not a serious newsplace. I did think about the problem some more. Maybe the whole Microkernel debate is an ego-issue too,

Re: Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour.

2014-01-07 Thread Richard Dunn
In case you missed it, Phoronix covered your original email. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=MTU1MTI On 1/7/14, Liam Lindholm wrote: > Mr. Karlsen, > > I find your response to my initial email quite interesting, but do not > quite understand it. My mind is very sluggish here in

Re: Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour.

2014-01-07 Thread Liam Lindholm
Mr. Karlsen, I find your response to my initial email quite interesting, but do not quite understand it. My mind is very sluggish here in Sweden where it is very, very cold. Sluggish like a cluster of 386s running Linux on a kitchen table in someone's backwoods shack. In case you didn't see it,

Re: Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour.

2014-01-07 Thread Liam Lindholm
Mr. Karlsen, I find your response to my initial email quite interesting, but do not quite understand it. My mind is very sluggish here in Sweden where it is very, very cold. Sluggish like a cluster of 386s running Linux on a kitchen table in someone's backwoods shack. In case you didn't see it,

Re: Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour.

2014-01-07 Thread Richard Dunn
In case you missed it, Phoronix covered your original email. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTU1MTI On 1/7/14, Liam Lindholm liam.oskar.lindh...@gmail.com wrote: Mr. Karlsen, I find your response to my initial email quite interesting, but do not quite understand it. My

Re: Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour.

2014-01-07 Thread Ove Karlsen
On 1/7/2014 9:52 PM, Richard Dunn wrote: In case you missed it, Phoronix covered your original email. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTU1MTI Phoronix is not a serious newsplace. I did think about the problem some more. Maybe the whole Microkernel debate is an ego-issue

Re: Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour.

2014-01-07 Thread Ove Karlsen
Just to be clear, no idolatry. At all. Anyways I am just going to use windows here, and maybe even get an E5 mac. It has logic audio, which I think is perfectly fine. I am almost nervous to contribute to this, seeing as much obscurity as it is. People will have to choose a solution good for

Re: Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour.

2014-01-07 Thread Ove Karlsen
And.. actually in commercial constructs one is also abused, but atleast one gets money. In open-source, or particulary Stallman idolaters, one is only abused. No limiter-awards, where technical excellence is recognized, because the algorithm does this and that, and this is optimal. None of

Re: Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour.

2014-01-07 Thread Ove Karlsen
I am realizing that Linux-brats are vere very much like abusive mushroom users aren´t they. I did ressearch on this, and that is where I have seen that behaviour before. Obviously only having them in the environment is influental, as I doubt they all do mushrooms. This will be included on my

Re: Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour.

2013-12-23 Thread Ove Karlsen
In school, many national idols, art, and "national romantic" writings are read. These are irrational variants of ancestor worship, that turns ignorant people to brats. A flag nothing else than a totempole. A monarchy nothing else than the development of old fertiliycults. Where Brutus and

Re: Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour.

2013-12-23 Thread Ove Karlsen
In school, many national idols, art, and national romantic writings are read. These are irrational variants of ancestor worship, that turns ignorant people to brats. A flag nothing else than a totempole. A monarchy nothing else than the development of old fertiliycults. Where Brutus and Bimbo