Re: Rik's VM contains a deadlock somewhere

2000-09-19 Thread Roger Larsson
Hi, I too tested to stress the new VM Quintelas mmap002 "deadlocks" for me. PPro, 96 MB, UP active: 22337 (I think this varies, have too lock a 2nd time) inactive_dirty: 324 varies inactive_clean: 0 free: 288 ... 1x 512 = 512 kB ... 2 x 16 + 1 x 32 + 1 x 64 = 640 kB My feeling when looking at

Re: Rik's VM contains a deadlock somewhere

2000-09-19 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Anton Petrusevich wrote: > please, check carefully Rik's VM patch, it definitly contains a > deadlock, which can be seen on low-memory computers. Try mem=8m. I > wasn't able to use any Rik patch since against -test8 (-t8-vmpatch{2,4}, > -test9-pre{1,2}). It boots

Re: Rik's VM contains a deadlock somewhere

2000-09-19 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Anton Petrusevich wrote: > Hi Linus, > > please, check carefully Rik's VM patch, it definitly contains a > deadlock, which can be seen on low-memory computers. Try mem=8m. I > wasn't able to use any Rik patch since against -test8 (-t8-vmpatch{2,4}, > -test9-pre{1,2}). It

Re: Rik's VM contains a deadlock somewhere

2000-09-19 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Anton Petrusevich wrote: Hi Linus, please, check carefully Rik's VM patch, it definitly contains a deadlock, which can be seen on low-memory computers. Try mem=8m. I wasn't able to use any Rik patch since against -test8 (-t8-vmpatch{2,4}, -test9-pre{1,2}). It boots

Re: Rik's VM contains a deadlock somewhere

2000-09-19 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Anton Petrusevich wrote: please, check carefully Rik's VM patch, it definitly contains a deadlock, which can be seen on low-memory computers. Try mem=8m. I wasn't able to use any Rik patch since against -test8 (-t8-vmpatch{2,4}, -test9-pre{1,2}). It boots fine(mem=16m),

Re: Rik's VM contains a deadlock somewhere

2000-09-19 Thread Roger Larsson
Hi, I too tested to stress the new VM Quintelas mmap002 "deadlocks" for me. PPro, 96 MB, UP active: 22337 (I think this varies, have too lock a 2nd time) inactive_dirty: 324 varies inactive_clean: 0 free: 288 ... 1x 512 = 512 kB ... 2 x 16 + 1 x 32 + 1 x 64 = 640 kB My feeling when looking at

Rik's VM contains a deadlock somewhere

2000-09-18 Thread Anton Petrusevich
Hi Linus, please, check carefully Rik's VM patch, it definitly contains a deadlock, which can be seen on low-memory computers. Try mem=8m. I wasn't able to use any Rik patch since against -test8 (-t8-vmpatch{2,4}, -test9-pre{1,2}). It boots fine(mem=16m), but then stalls begin for some time and

Rik's VM contains a deadlock somewhere

2000-09-18 Thread Anton Petrusevich
Hi Linus, please, check carefully Rik's VM patch, it definitly contains a deadlock, which can be seen on low-memory computers. Try mem=8m. I wasn't able to use any Rik patch since against -test8 (-t8-vmpatch{2,4}, -test9-pre{1,2}). It boots fine(mem=16m), but then stalls begin for some time and