Hi Jan,
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 09:53:31AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On May 4 2007 02:11, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >>
> >> Haha. Would you be happy if it ran on a CF card instead? :>
> >
> >Yes, because at least when you design a system to run on a CF card, you
> >ensure never to write on i
Øyvind Vågen Jægtnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Yes, i was suspecting that the arp cache got full, but i will try
>increasing it :)
>Would there be any huge bugs if i change these lines in arp.c:
>
>.gc_thresh1 = 128,
>.gc_thresh2 = 512,
>
>to
>
>.gc_thresh1 = 700,
On May 4 2007 05:48, Øyvind Vågen Jægtnes wrote:
>
> As a side note, i'm starting to wonder if it was worth the $20k when i
> could just have a linux machine to do the job with a clone for backup
> ;)
Most often not. The big bosses (which do most decisions yet are not
always the cluefulst wrt. t
On May 4 2007 02:11, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>
>> Haha. Would you be happy if it ran on a CF card instead? :>
>
>Yes, because at least when you design a system to run on a CF card, you
>ensure never to write on it because you know that would kill it. Then
>since you never write on it, it does not w
"Miquel van Smoorenburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And
> if you need to route more than say 3 gbit/s, PC hardware just
> won't cut it.
Each new x86 hardware generation normally can route more than the previous
generation. If you give out such a dubious number you would always need to give
it
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Its a Juniper M7i
>It comes default with a 5400 rpm laptop 2.5" harddrive but now we
>bought a more robust "server" 2.5" harddrive. It still barfs on the OS
>install, so the linux is doing all the job now. Will get a juniper guy
>to come and fix :)
>
>As a
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 05:48:18AM +0200, Øyvind Vågen Jægtnes wrote:
> Hi again :)
>
> On 5/4/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 11:12:09PM +0200, Øyvind Vågen Jægtnes wrote:
> >> On 5/3/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >On May 3 2007
Hi again :)
On 5/4/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 11:12:09PM +0200, Øyvind Vågen Jægtnes wrote:
> On 5/3/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >On May 3 2007 22:53, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >>> For the rest all we see in the arp cache is (incompl
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 12:50:17AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On May 4 2007 00:23, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >
> >> This setup will only run for about 1-2 hours while we fix the hardware
> >> router (it is running now, but only on a backup flash card solution.
> >> the harddrive in it died ;)
>
On May 4 2007 00:23, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
>> This setup will only run for about 1-2 hours while we fix the hardware
>> router (it is running now, but only on a backup flash card solution.
>> the harddrive in it died ;)
>
>Huhhh! Please tell us exactly what make and model of ROUTER you are using
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 11:12:09PM +0200, Øyvind Vågen Jægtnes wrote:
> On 5/3/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >On May 3 2007 22:53, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >>> For the rest all we see in the arp cache is (incomplete)
> >>
> >>I suspect that your arp cache is full (128 entries by
On Thu, 3 May 2007 22:53:46 +0200
Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:25:48PM +0200, Øyvind Vågen Jægtnes wrote:
> > Hi,
> Hi Øyvind.
>
> Forwarding your mail to netdev where the networking people are
> hanging out. Maybe they can help you.
>
> Sam
>
> >
On 5/3/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 3 2007 22:53, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> For the rest all we see in the arp cache is (incomplete)
>
>I suspect that your arp cache is full (128 entries by default).
>Check /proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/gc_thresh1 (128 for me). You can
>set it a
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:53:41PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:25:48PM +0200, Øyvind Vågen Jægtnes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have a one gigabit internet connection that is normally
> > routed by a hardware juniper router. The drive in this is down
> > and we need to us
On May 3 2007 22:53, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> For the rest all we see in the arp cache is (incomplete)
>
>I suspect that your arp cache is full (128 entries by default).
>Check /proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/gc_thresh1 (128 for me). You can
>set it as high as gc_thresh2 (512 for me), and I don't know wha
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:25:48PM +0200, Øyvind Vågen Jægtnes wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Øyvind.
Forwarding your mail to netdev where the networking people are
hanging out. Maybe they can help you.
Sam
>
> We have a one gigabit internet connection that is normally
> routed by a hardware juniper r
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:25:48PM +0200, Øyvind Vågen Jægtnes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a one gigabit internet connection that is normally
> routed by a hardware juniper router. The drive in this is down
> and we need to use a linux machine (Pentium D 3 ghz) as a
> temporary router.
> Now setting
On May 3 2007 22:25, Øyvind Vågen Jægtnes wrote:
>
> Now for the real setup.
> We closed the mac of the juniper to the network card that
> would be connected to the internal LAN, set up the interfaces,
> and swapped cables. This worked fine for approximately 100
> of the computers that are connect
Hi,
We have a one gigabit internet connection that is normally
routed by a hardware juniper router. The drive in this is down
and we need to use a linux machine (Pentium D 3 ghz) as a
temporary router.
Now setting up all the 600 vlans and assigning ip addresses
is no problem. We have testet all b
19 matches
Mail list logo
