Re: S390: bug in signal frame set up when using SA_ONSTACK

2005-03-23 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
Hi Bodo, > If a signal handler is set to use the signal stack (SA_ONSTACK), but > the signal stack is disabled, the signal frame should be written to > the current stack without stack switching. > S390 doesn't note, that the signal stack is disabled, so it does > stack switching to a stack at 0, s

S390: bug in signal frame set up when using SA_ONSTACK

2005-03-22 Thread Bodo Stroesser
Hi IMHO, there is a bug in s390's signal frame handling: If a signal handler is set to use the signal stack (SA_ONSTACK), but the signal stack is disabled, the signal frame should be written to the current stack without stack switching. S390 doesn't note, that the signal stack is disabled, so it do