Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:58:21AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Enhanced mode means separate SATA and PATA.
(I recommend avoiding the "IDE" acronym, it is largely meaningless and
confusing these days)
Good idea.
We're talking about Linux here. Linux regularly supports
Am Mittwoch 10 Januar 2007 19:19 schrieb Jeff Garzik:
> Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > Intel wants you to buy hw with ICH8R. ICH8 isn't get the advanced
> > features for free
>
> What advanced features do you claim are missing from ICH8?
I don't claim anything. Intel does. I know that the chip is
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
No doubt part of the Wintel (intel + Microsoft) strategy to perpetually
break non-windows platforms with new incompatible
hardware like the switch over from the e1000 MT adapters to e1000 GT
which are not backward compatible with the older chipsets.
I presume you mean
Prakash Punnoor wrote:
Am Mittwoch 10 Januar 2007 18:47 schrieb Lennart Sorensen:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:29:28PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
You can install the Intel Matrix driver after "adjusting" the inf file...
Hmm, I guess a good question is: Why should I have to edit the inf file?
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:56:05PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> Intel wants you to buy hw with ICH8R. ICH8 isn't get the advanced features
> for
> free
But the BIOS has AHCI mode as an option. I don't want their fake raid,
just ahci. That isn't an advanced feature, it is native mode.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:25:52AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> No doubt part of the Wintel (intel + Microsoft) strategy to perpetually
> break non-windows platforms with new incompatible
> hardware like the switch over from the e1000 MT adapters to e1000 GT
> which are not backward compatible
Am Mittwoch 10 Januar 2007 18:47 schrieb Lennart Sorensen:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:29:28PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > You can install the Intel Matrix driver after "adjusting" the inf file...
>
> Hmm, I guess a good question is: Why should I have to edit the inf file?
> Is it an issue
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:29:28PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
You can install the Intel Matrix driver after "adjusting" the inf file...
Hmm, I guess a good question is: Why should I have to edit the inf file?
Is it an issue of them making it only install if
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:29:28PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> You can install the Intel Matrix driver after "adjusting" the inf file...
Hmm, I guess a good question is: Why should I have to edit the inf file?
Is it an issue of them making it only install if your hardware is
already set to
Am Mittwoch 10 Januar 2007 15:39 schrieb Lennart Sorensen:
> I tried setting my sister's new machine to AHCI mode (Asus P5B with 965
> chipset), but I eventually gave up since it also needed windows xp on it
> and I can't for the life of me find an AHCI driver for windows that
> would install.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:58:21AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Enhanced mode means separate SATA and PATA.
>
> (I recommend avoiding the "IDE" acronym, it is largely meaningless and
> confusing these days)
Good idea.
> We're talking about Linux here. Linux regularly supports hardware
>
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 07:25:00PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Combined mode is a technical term. Judging from your answers, you are
not using combined mode.
I would have thought 'sata 3.0 + IDE' sounded a lot like combined mode,
unless it means seperate sata and ide.
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 07:25:00PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Combined mode is a technical term. Judging from your answers, you are
> not using combined mode.
I would have thought 'sata 3.0 + IDE' sounded a lot like combined mode,
unless it means seperate sata and ide.
> Judging from your
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 07:25:00PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Combined mode is a technical term. Judging from your answers, you are
not using combined mode.
I would have thought 'sata 3.0 + IDE' sounded a lot like combined mode,
unless it means seperate sata and ide.
Judging from your
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 07:25:00PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Combined mode is a technical term. Judging from your answers, you are
not using combined mode.
I would have thought 'sata 3.0 + IDE' sounded a lot like combined mode,
unless it means seperate sata and ide.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:58:21AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Enhanced mode means separate SATA and PATA.
(I recommend avoiding the IDE acronym, it is largely meaningless and
confusing these days)
Good idea.
We're talking about Linux here. Linux regularly supports hardware
before
Am Mittwoch 10 Januar 2007 15:39 schrieb Lennart Sorensen:
I tried setting my sister's new machine to AHCI mode (Asus P5B with 965
chipset), but I eventually gave up since it also needed windows xp on it
and I can't for the life of me find an AHCI driver for windows that
would install.
You
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:29:28PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
You can install the Intel Matrix driver after adjusting the inf file...
Hmm, I guess a good question is: Why should I have to edit the inf file?
Is it an issue of them making it only install if your hardware is
already set to ahci
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:29:28PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
You can install the Intel Matrix driver after adjusting the inf file...
Hmm, I guess a good question is: Why should I have to edit the inf file?
Is it an issue of them making it only install if
Am Mittwoch 10 Januar 2007 18:47 schrieb Lennart Sorensen:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:29:28PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
You can install the Intel Matrix driver after adjusting the inf file...
Hmm, I guess a good question is: Why should I have to edit the inf file?
Is it an issue of them
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:25:52AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
No doubt part of the Wintel (intel + Microsoft) strategy to perpetually
break non-windows platforms with new incompatible
hardware like the switch over from the e1000 MT adapters to e1000 GT
which are not backward compatible
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:56:05PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
Intel wants you to buy hw with ICH8R. ICH8 isn't get the advanced features
for
free
But the BIOS has AHCI mode as an option. I don't want their fake raid,
just ahci. That isn't an advanced feature, it is native mode. :)
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
No doubt part of the Wintel (intel + Microsoft) strategy to perpetually
break non-windows platforms with new incompatible
hardware like the switch over from the e1000 MT adapters to e1000 GT
which are not backward compatible with the older chipsets.
I presume you mean
Prakash Punnoor wrote:
Am Mittwoch 10 Januar 2007 18:47 schrieb Lennart Sorensen:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:29:28PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
You can install the Intel Matrix driver after adjusting the inf file...
Hmm, I guess a good question is: Why should I have to edit the inf file?
Am Mittwoch 10 Januar 2007 19:19 schrieb Jeff Garzik:
Prakash Punnoor wrote:
Intel wants you to buy hw with ICH8R. ICH8 isn't get the advanced
features for free
What advanced features do you claim are missing from ICH8?
I don't claim anything. Intel does. I know that the chip is
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:58:21AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Enhanced mode means separate SATA and PATA.
(I recommend avoiding the IDE acronym, it is largely meaningless and
confusing these days)
Good idea.
We're talking about Linux here. Linux regularly supports
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a
Shuttle motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked for about 30 seconds
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:46:42PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked for about 30 seconds before liquifying in the
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked for about 30 seconds before liquifying in the chassis.
I note that
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:46:42PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
> motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
> SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
>
> The chip worked for about 30 seconds
Auke Kok wrote:
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
root=/dev/hda2 is what was passed to the kernel from grub.
Jeff
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a
Shuttle motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
root=/dev/hda2 is what was passed to the kernel from grub.
Jeff
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
root=/dev/hda2 is what was passed to the kernel from grub.
Jeff
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked for about 30 seconds before liquifying in the chassis.
I note that the 945 chipset in the
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked for about 30 seconds before liquifying in the chassis.
I note that the 945 chipset in the
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
root=/dev/hda2 is what was passed to the kernel from grub.
Jeff
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
root=/dev/hda2 is what was passed to the kernel from grub.
Jeff
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux
Auke Kok wrote:
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
root=/dev/hda2 is what was passed to the kernel from grub.
Jeff
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a
Shuttle motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:46:42PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked for about 30 seconds
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked for about 30 seconds before liquifying in the chassis.
I note that
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked for about 30 seconds before liquifying in the
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:46:42PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a Shuttle
motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked for about 30 seconds
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
I just finished pulling out a melted IDE flash drive out of a
Shuttle motherboard with the intel 945 chipset which claims to support
SATA and IDE drives concurrently under Linux 2.6.18.
The chip worked
46 matches
Mail list logo
