Hi Christoph
You wrote:
>>Ok, thanks for your valuable input. In fact, I thought about making
>>the device available both as /dev/srX and /dev/sdX at the same time
>>in order to support partitions. In my case it would even suffice to
>>make it available as /dev/sdX instead of /dev/srX.
>
> That d
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:23:17AM +0200, Thomas Heinz wrote:
> Hi Christoph
>
> You wrote:
> >While adding support for partitions on sr is trivial it has a huge
> >drawback: it's chaning the dev_t space by using up device numbers
> >for partitions, so /dev/sr0 ff will have different device number
Hi Christoph
You wrote:
While adding support for partitions on sr is trivial it has a huge
drawback: it's chaning the dev_t space by using up device numbers
for partitions, so /dev/sr0 ff will have different device numbers
with that change applied. I have an old patch that's supposed to
enable
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 02:32:47PM +0200, Thomas Heinz wrote:
> Is it possible to make the DVD-RAM partitions available as device
> nodes (or at least directly mountable without the losetup hack)?
> One solution would be to make the device available as /dev/sdX and
> /dev/srX. Is that possible?
Wh
Hi
My SCSI DVD-RAM is available as /dev/sr1. fdisk -l /dev/sr1 shows
for a certain medium:
Note: sector size is 2048 (not 512)
Disk /dev/sr1: 2496 MB, 2496430080 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 75 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 2048 = 32901120 bytes
Device Boot Start
5 matches
Mail list logo
