On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:09:03PM +0100, David Jander wrote:
>
> Dear Ulf,
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:54:54 +0100
> Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > The code is in general fragile. We have have kind of reached the
> > point, when I apply changes that fixes one issue it may cause another.
>
> Oh, that is
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 01:22:29PM +0100, David Jander wrote:
> Ok, this sounds like a good way to go. Unfortunately it also sounds like a
> major endeavor, for which good knowledge of the SDHCI standard is necessary.
That's not entirely true.
Anyone who is really good at programming can fix this
Dear Ulf,
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:54:54 +0100
Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
>
> >> If/when you decide to fix this issue. Please keep in mind the following
> >> things.
> >>
> >> - Try to convert the SDHCI into a pure library. No more quirks or
> >> callbacks.
> >> - I assume we can simplify lots o
[...]
>> If/when you decide to fix this issue. Please keep in mind the following
>> things.
>>
>> - Try to convert the SDHCI into a pure library. No more quirks or callbacks.
>> - I assume we can simplify lots of code if we convert SDHCI into using
>> a threaded IRQ in favour of the tasklet.
>>
>>
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:39:20 +0100
Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 17 December 2015 at 12:27, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 17.12.2015, 12:20 +0100 schrieb David Jander:
> >> Hi Lucas,
> >>
> >> Thanks for reacting.
> >>
> >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:03:10 +0100
> >> Lucas Stach wrote:
> >>
>
On 17 December 2015 at 12:27, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 17.12.2015, 12:20 +0100 schrieb David Jander:
>> Hi Lucas,
>>
>> Thanks for reacting.
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:03:10 +0100
>> Lucas Stach wrote:
>>
>> > Am Donnerstag, den 17.12.2015, 11:28 +0100 schrieb David Jander:
>> >
Am Donnerstag, den 17.12.2015, 12:20 +0100 schrieb David Jander:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> Thanks for reacting.
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:03:10 +0100
> Lucas Stach wrote:
>
> > Am Donnerstag, den 17.12.2015, 11:28 +0100 schrieb David Jander:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I was investigating the source of
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for reacting.
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:03:10 +0100
Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 17.12.2015, 11:28 +0100 schrieb David Jander:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was investigating the source of abnormal irq-latency spikes on an i.MX6
> > (ARM) board, and discovered this:
> >
> >
Am Donnerstag, den 17.12.2015, 11:28 +0100 schrieb David Jander:
> Hi all,
>
> I was investigating the source of abnormal irq-latency spikes on an i.MX6
> (ARM) board, and discovered this:
>
> # tracer: preemptirqsoff
> #
> # preemptirqsoff latency trace v1.1.5 on 4.4.0-rc4+
> #
Hi all,
I was investigating the source of abnormal irq-latency spikes on an i.MX6
(ARM) board, and discovered this:
# tracer: preemptirqsoff
#
# preemptirqsoff latency trace v1.1.5 on 4.4.0-rc4+
#
# latency: 2068 us, #4/4, CPU
10 matches
Mail list logo