--Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Saturday, March 19, 2005 14:07:54
-0800):
> "Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think these are doing much for performance. Or at least
>> *something* in your tree isn't ...
>>
>> Kernbench:
>>
--Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Saturday, March 19, 2005 14:07:54
-0800):
Martin J. Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think these are doing much for performance. Or at least
*something* in your tree isn't ...
Kernbench:
Elapsed
"Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't think these are doing much for performance. Or at least
> *something* in your tree isn't ...
>
> Kernbench:
> ElapsedSystem User CPU
> elm3b67 2.6.11 50.24
I don't think these are doing much for performance. Or at least
*something* in your tree isn't ...
Kernbench:
ElapsedSystem User CPU
elm3b67 2.6.11 50.24146.60 1117.61 2516.67
elm3b67 2.6.11-mm1
I don't think these are doing much for performance. Or at least
*something* in your tree isn't ...
Kernbench:
ElapsedSystem User CPU
elm3b67 2.6.11 50.24146.60 1117.61 2516.67
elm3b67 2.6.11-mm1
Martin J. Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think these are doing much for performance. Or at least
*something* in your tree isn't ...
Kernbench:
ElapsedSystem User CPU
elm3b67 2.6.11 50.24146.60
6 matches
Mail list logo