> Complete 'dmesg' please.
See below.
Thanks,
Chase
Linux version 2.6.13 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.5-20050130 (Gentoo
Linux
3.3.5.20050130-r1, ssp-3.3.5.20050130-1, pie-8.7.7.1)) #2 SMP Sun Aug 28
23:54:34 CDT 2005
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
BIOS-e820: - 000
Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase Venters
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:04 PM
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Second "CPU" of 1-core HyperThreading CPU not found in 2.6.13
Gree
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase Venters
>Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:04 PM
>To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Second "CPU" of 1-core HyperThreading CPU not found in 2.6.13
>
>G
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Chase Venters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > CONFIG_MPENTIUM4, CONFIG_SMP and CONFIG_SCHED_SMT enabled?
> >
> > Yes in all three regards.
>
> Same here. Dual-Xeon 2.8Ghz, only 2 CPUs are being displayed.
After activating ACPI and power Management, HT wo
* Chase Venters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > CONFIG_MPENTIUM4, CONFIG_SMP and CONFIG_SCHED_SMT enabled?
>
> Yes in all three regards.
Same here. Dual-Xeon 2.8Ghz, only 2 CPUs are being displayed.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin Ber
> I needed CONFIG_PM=y and CONFIG_ACPI=y to get ht working on 2.6.13.
CONFIG_ACPI and CONFIG_PM are enabled here.
Thanks,
Chase Venters
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kerne
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 07:06 am, you wrote:
> On 8/30/05, Chase Venters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Greetings kind hackers...
> > I recently switched to 2.6.13 on my desktop. I noticed that the
> > second "CPU" (is there a better term to use in this HyperThreading
> > scenario?) that
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 8/30/05, Chase Venters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Greetings kind hackers...
>> I recently switched to 2.6.13 on my desktop. I noticed that the
>> second
>> "CPU" (is there a better term to use in this HyperThreading scenario?) that
>> used
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 at 23:03 +, Chase Venters wrote:
> Greetings kind hackers...
> I recently switched to 2.6.13 on my desktop. I noticed that the second
> "CPU" (is there a better term to use in this HyperThreading scenario?) that
> used to be listed in /proc/cpuinfo is no longer pres
On 8/30/05, Chase Venters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings kind hackers...
> I recently switched to 2.6.13 on my desktop. I noticed that the second
> "CPU" (is there a better term to use in this HyperThreading scenario?) that
> used to be listed in /proc/cpuinfo is no longer present.
Greetings kind hackers...
I recently switched to 2.6.13 on my desktop. I noticed that the second
"CPU" (is there a better term to use in this HyperThreading scenario?) that
used to be listed in /proc/cpuinfo is no longer present. Browsing over the
archives, it appears as if someone else
11 matches
Mail list logo
