On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > I also propose to increase the size of flip buffer to 640 bytes (so the
> > > flipping won't occur every time in the middle of the full buffer), however
> > > I understand that it's a rather drastic change for such a simple goal, and
> > > not every
Hi!
> > I also propose to increase the size of flip buffer to 640 bytes (so the
> > flipping won't occur every time in the middle of the full buffer), however
> > I understand that it's a rather drastic change for such a simple goal, and
> > not everyone will agree that it's worth the trouble:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Joe deBlaquiere wrote:
> >>I'm a little confused here... why are we overrunning? This thing is
> >> running externally at 19200 at best, even if it does all come in as a
> >> packet.
> >
> >
> > Different Merlin -- original Merlin is 19200, "Merlin for Ricochet" is
>
Alex Belits wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Joe deBlaquiere wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Alex!
>>
>> I'm a little confused here... why are we overrunning? This thing is
>> running externally at 19200 at best, even if it does all come in as a
>> packet.
>
>
> Different Merlin -- original Merlin i
How does this relate to IrDA with SIR speed of 115200 and max turnaround
of 500ms?
The max throughput is about 5000 bytes in 500ms.
Garst
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.or
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Joe deBlaquiere wrote:
> Hi Alex!
>
> I'm a little confused here... why are we overrunning? This thing is
> running externally at 19200 at best, even if it does all come in as a
> packet.
Different Merlin -- original Merlin is 19200, "Merlin for Ricochet" is
128Kbp
Hi Alex!
I'm a little confused here... why are we overrunning? This thing is
running externally at 19200 at best, even if it does all come in as a
packet. I would think the flip buffer would never contain more than a
few characters. Are you running it at a higher rate internally? Does
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I also propose to increase the size of flip buffer to 640 bytes (so the
> > flipping won't occur every time in the middle of the full buffer), however
> > I understand that it's a rather drastic change for such a simple goal, and
> > not everyone will agr
> I also propose to increase the size of flip buffer to 640 bytes (so the
> flipping won't occur every time in the middle of the full buffer), however
> I understand that it's a rather drastic change for such a simple goal, and
> not everyone will agree that it's worth the trouble:
Going to a 1
Greg Pomerantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and I have found that Novatel Merlin
for Ricochet PCMCIA card, while looking like otherwise ordinary serial
PCMCIA device, has the receive buffer 576 bytes long. When regular serial
driver reads the arrived data, it often runs out of 512-bytes flip buffer
and
10 matches
Mail list logo
