Quoting Mimi Zohar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Being able to compile both SELinux and SLIM into the kernel was done
> intentionally.
Intentionally so that you can switch back and forth for testing?
> The kernel parameters 'selinux' and 'slim' can enable
> or disable the LSM module at boot. Perhaps, f
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 13:05 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Being able to compile both SELinux and SLIM into the kernel was done
> intentionally. The kernel parameters 'selinux' and 'slim' can enable
> or disable the LSM module at boot. Perhaps, for the time being, the
> SECURITY_SLIM_BOOTPARAM_VALUE
Being able to compile both SELinux and SLIM into the kernel was done
intentionally. The kernel parameters 'selinux' and 'slim' can enable
or disable the LSM module at boot. Perhaps, for the time being, the
SECURITY_SLIM_BOOTPARAM_VALUE should default to 0.
Mimi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: s
Sorry, really for -mm .
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 07:48 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> If you have both SLIM and selinux compiled into your kernel selinux will panic
> if it can't register itself. The code below,
>
> if (register_security (&selinux_ops))
> panic("SELinux: Unable to register wi
4 matches
Mail list logo