On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:59:55 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jun 9 2007 08:08, Jon Masters wrote:
> >
> >So I missed half of this conversation - you're saying that on a
> >CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, you have such large .ko module files that depmod
> >segfaults? Can I get a core dump or any
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:59:55 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 9 2007 08:08, Jon Masters wrote:
So I missed half of this conversation - you're saying that on a
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, you have such large .ko module files that depmod
segfaults? Can I get a core dump or any further
On 6/9/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 9 2007 08:08, Jon Masters wrote:
>
>So I missed half of this conversation - you're saying that on a
>CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, you have such large .ko module files that depmod
>segfaults? Can I get a core dump or any further information?
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 15:59 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jun 9 2007 08:08, Jon Masters wrote:
> >
> >So I missed half of this conversation - you're saying that on a
> >CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, you have such large .ko module files that depmod
> >segfaults? Can I get a core dump or any further
On Jun 9 2007 08:08, Jon Masters wrote:
>
>So I missed half of this conversation - you're saying that on a
>CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, you have such large .ko module files that depmod
>segfaults? Can I get a core dump or any further information? :-)
Just make sure your /lib/modules/ is like 300
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 09:55 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jun 8 2007 08:40, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>
> >> If you disable CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, things should go back to normal
> >> sizes for you.
> >
> >grow so much compared to *which other modules*? the ones that came
> >with your distro?
On Jun 8 2007 08:40, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>
>> If you disable CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, things should go back to normal
>> sizes for you.
>
>grow so much compared to *which other modules*? the ones that came
>with your distro? if that's the case, try installing your new modules
>with
>
> # make
On Jun 8 2007 08:40, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
If you disable CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, things should go back to normal
sizes for you.
grow so much compared to *which other modules*? the ones that came
with your distro? if that's the case, try installing your new modules
with
# make
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 09:55 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 8 2007 08:40, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
If you disable CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, things should go back to normal
sizes for you.
grow so much compared to *which other modules*? the ones that came
with your distro? if that's the
On Jun 9 2007 08:08, Jon Masters wrote:
So I missed half of this conversation - you're saying that on a
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, you have such large .ko module files that depmod
segfaults? Can I get a core dump or any further information? :-)
Just make sure your /lib/modules/kernel is like 300
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 15:59 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 9 2007 08:08, Jon Masters wrote:
So I missed half of this conversation - you're saying that on a
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, you have such large .ko module files that depmod
segfaults? Can I get a core dump or any further information?
On 6/9/07, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 9 2007 08:08, Jon Masters wrote:
So I missed half of this conversation - you're saying that on a
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL, you have such large .ko module files that depmod
segfaults? Can I get a core dump or any further information? :-)
On 06/08/2007 08:40 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> # make INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 modules_install
>
> that makes a *huge* difference in the size of the installed modules,
> as i learned when i first ran across this on my fedora core system.
>
learn how to use rpmbuild:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:05:34PM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> > So, my question is the follwing: Is it an expected feature that the file
> > sizes of modules grow so much only because of a different cpu type and a
> > different localversion, or is
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:05:34PM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> So, my question is the follwing: Is it an expected feature that the file
> sizes of modules grow so much only because of a different cpu type and a
> different localversion, or is there probably a bug in my build tools?
>
The
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:05:34PM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
So, my question is the follwing: Is it an expected feature that the file
sizes of modules grow so much only because of a different cpu type and a
different localversion, or is there probably a bug in my build tools?
The kernel
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:05:34PM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
So, my question is the follwing: Is it an expected feature that the file
sizes of modules grow so much only because of a different cpu type and a
different localversion, or is there
On 06/08/2007 08:40 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
# make INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1 modules_install
that makes a *huge* difference in the size of the installed modules,
as i learned when i first ran across this on my fedora core system.
learn how to use rpmbuild:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:05:34PM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> I found out that the filenames are the same, but the size of the files
> differs very much. I found a module file in the new directory that was
> almost five times as large as the file with the same name in the old
> directory.
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:51:24PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 06/06/07, Christoph Pleger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I have a machine here which I installed with Ubuntu 7.04. Immediately
> >after the installation had been finished, I installed the Ubuntu package
> >which
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:05:34PM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a machine here which I installed with Ubuntu 7.04. Immediately
> after the installation had been finished, I installed the Ubuntu package
> which contains the Ubuntu-modified sources of the linux kernel. I
>
On Jun 6 2007 17:51, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 06/06/07, Christoph Pleger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a machine here which I installed with Ubuntu 7.04. Immediately
>> after the installation had been finished, I installed the Ubuntu package
>> which contains the
Christoph Pleger wrote:
> Hello,
>
[snip]
> After the new kernel package had been created, I installed it. After
> that, I looked into the directory /boot and was very surprised: The
> initial ramdisk of the new kernel was much larger than the initrd of the
> old kernel. To find out the cause for
On 06/06/07, Christoph Pleger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have a machine here which I installed with Ubuntu 7.04. Immediately
after the installation had been finished, I installed the Ubuntu package
which contains the Ubuntu-modified sources of the linux kernel. I
extracted the
Hello,
I have a machine here which I installed with Ubuntu 7.04. Immediately
after the installation had been finished, I installed the Ubuntu package
which contains the Ubuntu-modified sources of the linux kernel. I
extracted the resulting tar.bz2-file, copied the configuration of the
currently
Hello,
I have a machine here which I installed with Ubuntu 7.04. Immediately
after the installation had been finished, I installed the Ubuntu package
which contains the Ubuntu-modified sources of the linux kernel. I
extracted the resulting tar.bz2-file, copied the configuration of the
currently
On 06/06/07, Christoph Pleger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a machine here which I installed with Ubuntu 7.04. Immediately
after the installation had been finished, I installed the Ubuntu package
which contains the Ubuntu-modified sources of the linux kernel. I
extracted the resulting
Christoph Pleger wrote:
Hello,
[snip]
After the new kernel package had been created, I installed it. After
that, I looked into the directory /boot and was very surprised: The
initial ramdisk of the new kernel was much larger than the initrd of the
old kernel. To find out the cause for this,
On Jun 6 2007 17:51, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 06/06/07, Christoph Pleger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a machine here which I installed with Ubuntu 7.04. Immediately
after the installation had been finished, I installed the Ubuntu package
which contains the Ubuntu-modified sources of
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:05:34PM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
Hello,
I have a machine here which I installed with Ubuntu 7.04. Immediately
after the installation had been finished, I installed the Ubuntu package
which contains the Ubuntu-modified sources of the linux kernel. I
extracted
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:51:24PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 06/06/07, Christoph Pleger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a machine here which I installed with Ubuntu 7.04. Immediately
after the installation had been finished, I installed the Ubuntu package
which contains the
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:05:34PM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
I found out that the filenames are the same, but the size of the files
differs very much. I found a module file in the new directory that was
almost five times as large as the file with the same name in the old
directory.
32 matches
Mail list logo
