On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:24:48AM -0800, Purush Gupta wrote:
> I noticed you had benchmarked only sda target, is the behavior same on
> other targets?
>
Yes the other disk are equal to sda , but they are used with zfs and there were
other preformance problems because of the multible disk
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:24:48AM -0800, Purush Gupta wrote:
I noticed you had benchmarked only sda target, is the behavior same on
other targets?
Yes the other disk are equal to sda , but they are used with zfs and there were
other preformance problems because of the multible disk access.
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:51:27PM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:40 PM, markus wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:21:07AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Markus wrote:
> >>
> I am not familiar with this message:
>
> "Device supports
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:51:27PM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:40 PM, markus mar...@kola.li wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:21:07AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Markus mar...@kola.li wrote:
SNIP
I am not familiar with this message:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:40 PM, markus wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:21:07AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Markus wrote:
>>
>>
>> > The hdparm result looks like there is somethink not right . There were no
>> > features supported but why ?
>>
>>
>> Does the
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:40 PM, markus mar...@kola.li wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:21:07AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Markus mar...@kola.li wrote:
SNIP
The hdparm result looks like there is somethink not right . There were no
features supported but why
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:21:07AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Markus wrote:
>
>
> > The hdparm result looks like there is somethink not right . There were no
> > features supported but why ?
>
>
> Does the HDD have S.M.A.R.T. features? Possibly
>
> smartctl
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Markus wrote:
> The hdparm result looks like there is somethink not right . There were no
> features supported but why ?
Does the HDD have S.M.A.R.T. features? Possibly
smartctl -a /dev/sda
would provide some additional visibility?
- Mark
--
To unsubscribe
Hi
I have problem with SATA disks at my Sunfire v245 and its lsi controller they
are very slow.
So I test it with dd and while dd in a nother terminal i see dstat results of
sda:
Copy from ramdisk to sda.
=== Test ext4 ===
DD
root@outpost:/ramdisk# dd if=debian-7.4.0-sparc-netinst.iso
Hi
I have problem with SATA disks at my Sunfire v245 and its lsi controller they
are very slow.
So I test it with dd and while dd in a nother terminal i see dstat results of
sda:
Copy from ramdisk to sda.
=== Test ext4 ===
DD
root@outpost:/ramdisk# dd if=debian-7.4.0-sparc-netinst.iso
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Markus mar...@kola.li wrote:
SNIP
The hdparm result looks like there is somethink not right . There were no
features supported but why ?
Does the HDD have S.M.A.R.T. features? Possibly
smartctl -a /dev/sda
would provide some additional visibility?
- Mark
--
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:21:07AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Markus mar...@kola.li wrote:
SNIP
The hdparm result looks like there is somethink not right . There were no
features supported but why ?
Does the HDD have S.M.A.R.T. features? Possibly
12 matches
Mail list logo
