Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-05 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink >>> >>> And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ? >>> Would you volunteer to handle the support

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-05 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ? Would you volunteer to handle the support load on l-k that

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-04 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
>>> can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done >>> with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink >> >> And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ? >> Would you volunteer to handle the support load on l-k that would cause? > > Hardcoding kgcc is

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-04 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 2001.01.04 Alan Cox wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Silly question: > > > > > > can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done > > > with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink > > > > And break compilation on all non

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-04 Thread Alan Cox
> > And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ? > > I don't buy that. The compulsory modutils upgrade a couple of months > back caused, what? Ten emails? Most people are still using the old old modutils - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-04 Thread Alan Cox
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Silly question: > > > > can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done > > with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink > > And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ? > Would

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-04 Thread Andrew Morton
Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Silly question: > > > > can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done > > with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink > > And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-04 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > Silly question: > > can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done > with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ? Would you volunteer to

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-04 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: Silly question: can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ? Would you volunteer to

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-04 Thread Andrew Morton
Andi Kleen wrote: On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: Silly question: can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ?

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-04 Thread Alan Cox
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: Silly question: can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ? Would you

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-04 Thread Alan Cox
And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ? I don't buy that. The compulsory modutils upgrade a couple of months back caused, what? Ten emails? Most people are still using the old old modutils - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-04 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 2001.01.04 Alan Cox wrote: On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: Silly question: can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-04 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ? Would you volunteer to handle the support load on l-k that would cause? Hardcoding kgcc is definitely

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-03 Thread Andrew Morton
Silly question: can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-03 Thread Pete Zaitcev
>Date:Wed, 03 Jan 2001 22:08:33 -0800 >From: Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Are we going to use Miquel's patch? I cannot build fresh 2.2.x on >plain RH6.2 without it. The 2.2.19-pre6 comes out without it. Or >is "install new bash" the official answer? Alan? > >

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-03 Thread David S. Miller
Date:Wed, 03 Jan 2001 22:08:33 -0800 From: Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Are we going to use Miquel's patch? I cannot build fresh 2.2.x on plain RH6.2 without it. The 2.2.19-pre6 comes out without it. Or is "install new bash" the official answer? Alan? I do not

So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-03 Thread Pete Zaitcev
Are we going to use Miquel's patch? I cannot build fresh 2.2.x on plain RH6.2 without it. The 2.2.19-pre6 comes out without it. Or is "install new bash" the official answer? Alan? -- Pete --- linux-2.2.19-pre3/scripts/kwhichSun Dec 10 16:49:45 2000 +++ linux-2.2.19-pre3-p3/scripts/kwhich

So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-03 Thread Pete Zaitcev
Are we going to use Miquel's patch? I cannot build fresh 2.2.x on plain RH6.2 without it. The 2.2.19-pre6 comes out without it. Or is "install new bash" the official answer? Alan? -- Pete --- linux-2.2.19-pre3/scripts/kwhichSun Dec 10 16:49:45 2000 +++ linux-2.2.19-pre3-p3/scripts/kwhich

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-03 Thread David S. Miller
Date:Wed, 03 Jan 2001 22:08:33 -0800 From: Pete Zaitcev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are we going to use Miquel's patch? I cannot build fresh 2.2.x on plain RH6.2 without it. The 2.2.19-pre6 comes out without it. Or is "install new bash" the official answer? Alan? I do not

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-03 Thread Pete Zaitcev
Date:Wed, 03 Jan 2001 22:08:33 -0800 From: Pete Zaitcev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are we going to use Miquel's patch? I cannot build fresh 2.2.x on plain RH6.2 without it. The 2.2.19-pre6 comes out without it. Or is "install new bash" the official answer? Alan? I do not

Re: So, what about kwhich on RH6.2?

2001-01-03 Thread Andrew Morton
Silly question: can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at