On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
>>>
>>> And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ?
>>> Would you volunteer to handle the support
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ?
Would you volunteer to handle the support load on l-k that
>>> can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
>>> with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
>>
>> And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ?
>> Would you volunteer to handle the support load on l-k that would cause?
>
> Hardcoding kgcc is
On 2001.01.04 Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Silly question:
> > >
> > > can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
> > > with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
> >
> > And break compilation on all non
> > And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ?
>
> I don't buy that. The compulsory modutils upgrade a couple of months
> back caused, what? Ten emails?
Most people are still using the old old modutils
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Silly question:
> >
> > can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
> > with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
>
> And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ?
> Would
Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Silly question:
> >
> > can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
> > with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
>
> And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Silly question:
>
> can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
> with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ?
Would you volunteer to
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
Silly question:
can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ?
Would you volunteer to
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
Silly question:
can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ?
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
Silly question:
can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ?
Would you
And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ?
I don't buy that. The compulsory modutils upgrade a couple of months
back caused, what? Ten emails?
Most people are still using the old old modutils
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On 2001.01.04 Alan Cox wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 07:13:58PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote:
Silly question:
can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non
can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
And break compilation on all non RedHat 7, non connectiva systems ?
Would you volunteer to handle the support load on l-k that would cause?
Hardcoding kgcc is definitely
Silly question:
can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
>Date:Wed, 03 Jan 2001 22:08:33 -0800
>From: Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Are we going to use Miquel's patch? I cannot build fresh 2.2.x on
>plain RH6.2 without it. The 2.2.19-pre6 comes out without it. Or
>is "install new bash" the official answer? Alan?
>
>
Date:Wed, 03 Jan 2001 22:08:33 -0800
From: Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Are we going to use Miquel's patch? I cannot build fresh 2.2.x on
plain RH6.2 without it. The 2.2.19-pre6 comes out without it. Or
is "install new bash" the official answer? Alan?
I do not
Are we going to use Miquel's patch? I cannot build fresh 2.2.x
on plain RH6.2 without it. The 2.2.19-pre6 comes out without it.
Or is "install new bash" the official answer? Alan?
-- Pete
--- linux-2.2.19-pre3/scripts/kwhichSun Dec 10 16:49:45 2000
+++ linux-2.2.19-pre3-p3/scripts/kwhich
Are we going to use Miquel's patch? I cannot build fresh 2.2.x
on plain RH6.2 without it. The 2.2.19-pre6 comes out without it.
Or is "install new bash" the official answer? Alan?
-- Pete
--- linux-2.2.19-pre3/scripts/kwhichSun Dec 10 16:49:45 2000
+++ linux-2.2.19-pre3-p3/scripts/kwhich
Date:Wed, 03 Jan 2001 22:08:33 -0800
From: Pete Zaitcev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are we going to use Miquel's patch? I cannot build fresh 2.2.x on
plain RH6.2 without it. The 2.2.19-pre6 comes out without it. Or
is "install new bash" the official answer? Alan?
I do not
Date:Wed, 03 Jan 2001 22:08:33 -0800
From: Pete Zaitcev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are we going to use Miquel's patch? I cannot build fresh 2.2.x on
plain RH6.2 without it. The 2.2.19-pre6 comes out without it. Or
is "install new bash" the official answer? Alan?
I do not
Silly question:
can't we just hardwire `kgcc' into the build system and be done
with all this kwhich stuff? It's just a symlink
-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
22 matches
Mail list logo