Parallel Redundancy Protocol (PRP) is another redundancy protocol
introduced by IEC 63439 standard. It is similar to HSR in many
aspects:-
- Use a pair of Ethernet interfaces to created the PRP device
- Use a 6 byte redundancy protocol part (RCT, Redundancy Check
Trailer) similar to HSR Tag.
Hi Randy
On 7/20/20 2:37 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 7/20/20 9:57 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
diff --git a/net/hsr/Kconfig b/net/hsr/Kconfig
index 8095b034e76e..e2e396870230 100644
--- a/net/hsr/Kconfig
+++ b/net/hsr/Kconfig
@@ -4,24 +4,35 @@
#
config HSR
- tristate "High-availabil
On 7/20/20 9:57 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> diff --git a/net/hsr/Kconfig b/net/hsr/Kconfig
> index 8095b034e76e..e2e396870230 100644
> --- a/net/hsr/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/hsr/Kconfig
> @@ -4,24 +4,35 @@
> #
>
> config HSR
> - tristate "High-availability Seamless Redundancy (HSR)"
> - he
Parallel Redundancy Protocol (PRP) is another redundancy protocol
introduced by IEC 63439 standard. It is similar to HSR in many
aspects:-
- Use a pair of Ethernet interfaces to created the PRP device
- Use a 6 byte redundancy protocol part (RCT, Redundancy Check
Trailer) similar to HSR Tag.
On 7/17/20 9:56 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Murali Karicheri
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:15:05 -0400
@@ -32,7 +33,9 @@ static int hsr_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device
*dev,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct net_device *link[2];
-
From: Murali Karicheri
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:15:05 -0400
> @@ -32,7 +33,9 @@ static int hsr_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct
> net_device *dev,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct net_device *link[2];
> - unsigned char multicast_spec, hsr_version
Parallel Redundancy Protocol (PRP) is another redundancy protocol
introduced by IEC 63439 standard. It is similar to HSR in many
aspects:-
- Use a pair of Ethernet interfaces to created the PRP device
- Use a 6 byte redundancy protocol part (RCT, Redundancy Check
Trailer) similar to HSR Tag.
Parallel Redundancy Protocol (PRP) is another redundancy protocol
introduced by IEC 63439 standard. It is similar to HSR in many
aspects:-
- Use a pair of Ethernet interfaces to created the PRP device
- Use a 6 byte redundancy protocol part (RCT, Redundancy Check
Trailer) similar to HSR Tag.
Similar to HSR, add a netlink socket interface code re-using the
common functions from hsr_prp_netlink.c. Use wrapper functions
for hsr_dev_setup() and prp_dev_setup() to setup HSR/PRP interface
by calling common hsr_prp_dev_setup().
Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri
---
net/hsr-prp/Makefile
- Received message begins Here -
Admin Mailing Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
[snip]
>> There are dozens of similarly different (or differently similar - as your
>> prefer) Linux based O/Ses distributions around the world and some have had
>> 6.x versionning when RedHat was also 6
[Gérard Roudier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> There are dozens of similarly different (or differently similar - as
> your prefer) Linux based O/Ses distributions around the world and
> some have had 6.x versionning when RedHat was also 6.x (SuSe for
> example).
True enough. But empirically, I have not
>
> > Note that I deliberately ignored my assumption when replying -- I gave
> > instructions for Debian derivations, even though I don't know of any
> > Debian-derived distribution with a version number 6.2.
>
> There are dozens of similarly different (or differently similar - as your
> prefer)
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Peter Samuelson]
> > > But it really bugs me when someone uses the term 'Linux 6.2' (:
> > > I could not resist pointing out the distinction.
>
> [Gérard Roudier]
> > You seem to do the same confusion of assuming that Linux is RedHat. Note
>
[Peter Samuelson]
> > But it really bugs me when someone uses the term 'Linux 6.2' (:
> > I could not resist pointing out the distinction.
[Gérard Roudier]
> You seem to do the same confusion of assuming that Linux is RedHat. Note
> that it is not your fault. We all are so screwed by marke
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Peter Samuelson]
> > > There is no Linux 6.2. The newest version is a prerelease of 2.4.0.
>
> [Igmar Palsenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> > I'll bet you a beer he's using RedHat :)
A german beer ? ;-)
> Yes, yes. You know he's using Red Hat and
[Peter Samuelson]
> > There is no Linux 6.2. The newest version is a prerelease of 2.4.0.
[Igmar Palsenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> I'll bet you a beer he's using RedHat :)
Yes, yes. You know he's using Red Hat and I know he's using Red Hat.
But it really bugs me when someone uses the term '
Sorry for No Subject ...
I accidentaly sent it before filling Subject :(
Andrej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Eric Chen]
> > I have brought up a PC running Linux 6.2.
>
> There is no Linux 6.2. The newest version is a prerelease of 2.4.0.
I'll bet you a beer he's using RedHat :)
> In any case, I suggest you look at a client for the 'finger' protocol,
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Chen, Eric wrote:
> Dear Helpers:
>
> This is a question from a Linux idiot. Please bear with me. I have brought
> up a PC running Linux 6.2. I need to develop a simple C program using
> TCP/IP protocol (socket interface) to talk to another PC on the net
[Eric Chen]
> I have brought up a PC running Linux 6.2.
There is no Linux 6.2. The newest version is a prerelease of 2.4.0.
Unlike other OSes you may be familiar with (e.g. FreeBSD), there is no
de facto standard distribution of kernel and apps -- there are half a
dozen major players and hundr
Dear Helpers:
This is a question from a Linux idiot. Please bear with me. I have brought
up a PC running Linux 6.2. I need to develop a simple C program using
TCP/IP protocol (socket interface) to talk to another PC on the network. I
need some help in getting the necessary documentation and
21 matches
Mail list logo
