On Monday 02 July 2001 04:58, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> While on the topic of reslilent, high-performance filesystems, what ever
> became of "Tux", Daniel Philip's mythical WAFL-type filesystem?
He's working on it.
--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kerne
While on the topic of reslilent, high-performance filesystems, what ever
became of "Tux", Daniel Philip's mythical WAFL-type filesystem?
On 01 Jul 2001 23:33:52 -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Alex Khripin wrote:
>
> > There was a discussion in October, 2000, about the Granger
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Alex Khripin wrote:
> There was a discussion in October, 2000, about the Granger and
> McKusick paper on soft updates for the BSD FFS. Reading the thread,
> nothing conclusive seemed to come out of it.
What you want is ext3.
It is a journaling version of ext2, which basical
Hi,
There was a discussion in October, 2000, about the Granger and McKusick paper
on soft updates for the BSD FFS. Reading the thread, nothing conclusive seemed
to come out of it.
The paper is available at http://www.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/~ganger/papers/CSE-TR-25
4-95/
The code for the BSD implementa
4 matches
Mail list logo
