On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 04:26:07PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> Submitted couple of patches for the missing pieces in TCPM.
> Those patches along with "usb: typec: update partner power delivery
> support with opmode"
> seems to address the issue of reporting the right value for
> supports
Submitted couple of patches for the missing pieces in TCPM.
Those patches along with "usb: typec: update partner power delivery
support with opmode"
seems to address the issue of reporting the right value for
supports_usb_power_delivery.
Thanks,
Badhri
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Badhri Jaga
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Heikki Krogerus
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:57:15AM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
>> Hi Heikki,
>>
>> While testing with different type-c phones available in the market,
>> With some phones, I noticed that supports_usb_power_delivery
>> repor
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:57:15AM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> Hi Heikki,
>
> While testing with different type-c phones available in the market,
> With some phones, I noticed that supports_usb_power_delivery
> reports "no" eventhough an explicit pd contract has been
> established.
Hi Heikki,
While testing with different type-c phones available in the market,
With some phones, I noticed that supports_usb_power_delivery
reports "no" eventhough an explicit pd contract has been
established. After spending sometime debugging, I noticed that
the root cause of this is that the par
5 matches
Mail list logo