Re: Sometimes supports_usb_power_delivery reports incorrect value.

2017-08-16 Thread Heikki Krogerus
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 04:26:07PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: > Submitted couple of patches for the missing pieces in TCPM. > Those patches along with "usb: typec: update partner power delivery > support with opmode" > seems to address the issue of reporting the right value for > supports

Re: Sometimes supports_usb_power_delivery reports incorrect value.

2017-08-15 Thread Badhri Jagan Sridharan
Submitted couple of patches for the missing pieces in TCPM. Those patches along with "usb: typec: update partner power delivery support with opmode" seems to address the issue of reporting the right value for supports_usb_power_delivery. Thanks, Badhri On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Badhri Jaga

Re: Sometimes supports_usb_power_delivery reports incorrect value.

2017-08-15 Thread Badhri Jagan Sridharan
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:57:15AM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: >> Hi Heikki, >> >> While testing with different type-c phones available in the market, >> With some phones, I noticed that supports_usb_power_delivery >> repor

Re: Sometimes supports_usb_power_delivery reports incorrect value.

2017-08-15 Thread Heikki Krogerus
Hi, On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:57:15AM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: > Hi Heikki, > > While testing with different type-c phones available in the market, > With some phones, I noticed that supports_usb_power_delivery > reports "no" eventhough an explicit pd contract has been > established.

Sometimes supports_usb_power_delivery reports incorrect value.

2017-08-14 Thread Badhri Jagan Sridharan
Hi Heikki, While testing with different type-c phones available in the market, With some phones, I noticed that supports_usb_power_delivery reports "no" eventhough an explicit pd contract has been established. After spending sometime debugging, I noticed that the root cause of this is that the par