Hi,
Is there any chance that 74d290da476f672ad756634d12aa707375d3564d
([CIFS] Provide sane values for nlink) could be backported to the stable
3.2 kernel?
The reason I ask is because if you Using a Debain Wheezy box with a
3.2.41-2+deb7u2 kernel the following is problematic:
Mount a share using
The patch is a little larger than usual for stable but for those where
the backport is trivial, seems reasonable candidate for stable.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any chance that 74d290da476f672ad756634d12aa707375d3564d
> ([CIFS] Provide sane values
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:24:43PM +, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any chance that 74d290da476f672ad756634d12aa707375d3564d
> ([CIFS] Provide sane values for nlink) could be backported to the stable
> 3.2 kernel?
Why just 3.2? What's wrong with all of the other kernels before 3.
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:11:56 -0800
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:24:43PM +, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there any chance that 74d290da476f672ad756634d12aa707375d3564d
> > ([CIFS] Provide sane values for nlink) could be backported to the stable
> > 3.2 k
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 09:43:06AM -0800, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:11:56 -0800
> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:24:43PM +, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there any chance that 74d290da476f672ad756634d12aa707375d3564d
> > > ([CIFS] Provide
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 09:43:06AM -0800, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:11:56 -0800
> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:24:43PM +, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there any chance that 74d290da476f672ad756634d12aa707375d3564d
> > > ([CIF
6 matches
Mail list logo