Stable backport of cifs nlink workaround?

2014-02-25 Thread Sitsofe Wheeler
Hi, Is there any chance that 74d290da476f672ad756634d12aa707375d3564d ([CIFS] Provide sane values for nlink) could be backported to the stable 3.2 kernel? The reason I ask is because if you Using a Debain Wheezy box with a 3.2.41-2+deb7u2 kernel the following is problematic: Mount a share using

Re: Stable backport of cifs nlink workaround?

2014-02-25 Thread Steve French
The patch is a little larger than usual for stable but for those where the backport is trivial, seems reasonable candidate for stable. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any chance that 74d290da476f672ad756634d12aa707375d3564d > ([CIFS] Provide sane values

Re: Stable backport of cifs nlink workaround?

2014-02-25 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:24:43PM +, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any chance that 74d290da476f672ad756634d12aa707375d3564d > ([CIFS] Provide sane values for nlink) could be backported to the stable > 3.2 kernel? Why just 3.2? What's wrong with all of the other kernels before 3.

Re: Stable backport of cifs nlink workaround?

2014-02-25 Thread Jeff Layton
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:11:56 -0800 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:24:43PM +, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there any chance that 74d290da476f672ad756634d12aa707375d3564d > > ([CIFS] Provide sane values for nlink) could be backported to the stable > > 3.2 k

Re: Stable backport of cifs nlink workaround?

2014-02-25 Thread Sitsofe Wheeler
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 09:43:06AM -0800, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:11:56 -0800 > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:24:43PM +, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > > > > > > Is there any chance that 74d290da476f672ad756634d12aa707375d3564d > > > ([CIFS] Provide

Re: Stable backport of cifs nlink workaround?

2014-03-04 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 09:43:06AM -0800, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:11:56 -0800 > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:24:43PM +, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Is there any chance that 74d290da476f672ad756634d12aa707375d3564d > > > ([CIF