On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 07:24:16PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:13:19 -0500,
> Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ago were done in the kernel, POSIX message queue passing is not doable in
> > userland without kernel help either (I have a message queue filesystem
>
At Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:13:19 -0500,
Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ago were done in the kernel, POSIX message queue passing is not doable in
> userland without kernel help either (I have a message queue filesystem
> kernel patch for this, but it is a 2.5 thing).
Interesting. Is yours
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:00:09AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Also, from what I've seen lately on IRC and lkml, the Single Unix
> Specification ("SuS") is generally held in higher regard than POSIX; and
> when spec questions arise, kernel developers tend to check SuS before
> POSIX (if POSIX is c
> "J" == Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
J> Would it be reasonable to have these needs documented in a
J> central location, with patches attached where possible?
http://kernelbook.sourceforge.net:80/wiki/?LinuxAndPosixCompliance
The lead-in discussion has been snipped and in
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:00:09AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Also, from what I've seen lately on IRC and lkml, the Single Unix
> Specification ("SuS") is generally held in higher regard than POSIX; and
> when spec questions arise, kernel developers tend to check SuS before
> POSIX (if POSIX is
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Well, it does not do its best. There are several areas where kernel should
> help, things like POSIX semaphores would be much faster with kernel support,
> likewise threads if some things Ulrich stated here a couple of months
> ago were done in the kernel,
Would it be reaso
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:00:09AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I've searched the archives for this list
> > (http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/) and only come with references
> > from 1996!
> >
> > What is the state of Posix-com
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I've searched the archives for this list
> > (http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/) and only
> come with references
> > from 1996!
> >
> > What is the state of Posix-compliant services (threads,
> semaphores, timers,
> > etc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I've searched the archives for this list
> (http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/) and only come with references
> from 1996!
>
> What is the state of Posix-compliant services (threads, semaphores, timers,
> etc.) in the current (v2.
Hello.
Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I've searched the archives for this list
(http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/) and only come with references
from 1996!
What is the state of Posix-compliant services (threads, semaphores, timers,
etc.) in the current (v2.2/v2.4) Linux kernels?
Tha
10 matches
Mail list logo
