quot; , "Borislav Petkov" , "Joerg
> Roedel" , "Marc
> Zyngier" , "Yinghai Lu" , "Alex
> Williamson" ,
> "Mathieu Desnoyers" , "Frederic Weisbecker"
>
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 10:52:01 AM
> Su
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:35:14 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>2) Proper trace point support so we can actually track allocation
> and the hardware access at the various domain levels because
> some of these issues cannot be decoded by looking at a state
> snapshot in debu
On 2014/12/13 4:35, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Folks,
>
> after mulling this in my head for quite some time, I'm going to
> postpone the whole thing for 3.20.
>
> That said, I need to say, that I'm really happy with the outcome of
> this massive overhaul. I really want to thank all involved people,
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:35:14 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> We're almost there with x86 but my gut feeling tells me that pushing
> it now is too risky. I rather prefer quiet holidays for all of us than
> the nagging fear that the post holiday inbox will be full of obscure
> bug reports and
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> This will block other things in that area for a while, but it's the
> only sane decision at the moment, unless Linus insists on pulling the
> lot and promises to deal with the fallout. :)
Heh, no. I'll happily vote for a calm xmas seaso
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:35:14PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> To provide a proper translation into pretty printed values we
> can do the following:
>
>Create a new section for storing such data and have a data
>structure there which describes the content of the buf
Folks,
after mulling this in my head for quite some time, I'm going to
postpone the whole thing for 3.20.
That said, I need to say, that I'm really happy with the outcome of
this massive overhaul. I really want to thank all involved people,
especially Jiang, for their great work and help so far!!
7 matches
Mail list logo
