Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hmmm, sorry for asking, but when do you plan to offer a "working"
> union-mount (u-m)?
It's a maze of twisty locking problems - some of which also apply to things
like overlayfs:-(
> What's the status of the user-space tools or are they no more needed?
You need to be able
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:19 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
>> what's the status of union-mount?
>
> It's being reengineered again to take account of VFS changes that went in in
> the last merge window.
>
Hmmm, sorry for asking, but when do y
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> what's the status of union-mount?
>> Where does the development happen - in [1]?
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Sedat -
>>
>>
Sedat Dilek wrote:
> what's the status of union-mount?
It's being reengineered again to take account of VFS changes that went in in
the last merge window.
> Where does the development happen - in [1]?
On a git tree on my PC - which is occasionally mirrored in [1] when I
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what's the status of union-mount?
> Where does the development happen - in [1]?
>
> Regards,
> - Sedat -
>
> [1]
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=unionmou
5 matches
Mail list logo