Re: Status of union-mount?

2013-03-21 Thread David Howells
Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hmmm, sorry for asking, but when do you plan to offer a "working" > union-mount (u-m)? It's a maze of twisty locking problems - some of which also apply to things like overlayfs:-( > What's the status of the user-space tools or are they no more needed? You need to be able

Re: Status of union-mount?

2013-03-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:19 PM, David Howells wrote: > Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> what's the status of union-mount? > > It's being reengineered again to take account of VFS changes that went in in > the last merge window. > Hmmm, sorry for asking, but when do y

Re: Status of union-mount?

2013-03-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> what's the status of union-mount? >> Where does the development happen - in [1]? >> >> Regards, >> - Sedat - >> >>

Re: Status of union-mount?

2013-03-12 Thread David Howells
Sedat Dilek wrote: > what's the status of union-mount? It's being reengineered again to take account of VFS changes that went in in the last merge window. > Where does the development happen - in [1]? On a git tree on my PC - which is occasionally mirrored in [1] when I&#

Re: Status of union-mount?

2013-03-12 Thread Mark Knecht
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > what's the status of union-mount? > Where does the development happen - in [1]? > > Regards, > - Sedat - > > [1] > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=unionmou