Rene Herman wrote:
> On 08/17/2007 03:58 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Rene Herman wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/16/2007 11:39 PM, Stefan Richter wrote:
Rene Herman wrote:
>
> I personally don't think there's a whole lot wrong with more and
> more expecting people who submit
On 08/17/2007 03:58 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Rene Herman wrote:
On 08/16/2007 11:39 PM, Stefan Richter wrote:
Rene Herman wrote:
I personally don't think there's a whole lot wrong with more and
more expecting people who submit patches (for whom this automation
is intende
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Rene Herman wrote:
> On 08/16/2007 11:39 PM, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > Rene Herman wrote:
>
> >> I personally don't think there's a whole lot wrong with more and more
> >> expecting people who submit patches (for whom this automation is
> >> intended) to be using git.
> >
>
On 08/16/2007 11:39 PM, Stefan Richter wrote:
Rene Herman wrote:
I personally don't think there's a whole lot wrong with more and more
expecting people who submit patches (for whom this automation is
intended) to be using git.
You mean "people who frequently submit patches for various differ
Rene Herman wrote:
> I personally don't think there's a whole lot wrong with more and more
> expecting people who submit patches (for whom this automation is
> intended) to be using git.
You mean "people who frequently submit patches for various different
subsystems".
--
Stefan Richter
-=-=-=
On 08/16/2007 05:31 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
Please remember that not everybody uses git. The MAINTAINERS data
should be available in the kernel source itself.
It may be useful to generate a MAINTAINERS file into releases yes.
I must say though that "why?" would also be a question. I personally
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Rene Herman wrote:
> > It would be much easier to put in the "kernel/somesubsys" directory a
> > Maintainers file which has:
>
> It's ofcourse possible, but note that if we want this stuff to be minimally
> manual, moving files around (and deleting them) then requires editi
On 08/16/2007 03:04 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Aug 16, 2007, at 07:57:23, Rene Herman wrote:
category as .gitignore, which would _be_ a property.
If you do this stuff in files scattered around the tree, updating and
moving stuff becomes a pain -- the tool would need to go edit files.
From
Merging a couple related threads here:
On Aug 16, 2007, at 07:57:23, Rene Herman wrote:
On 08/16/2007 01:26 PM, Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Rene Herman wrote:
Perhaps that immediately suggests an implementation to someone
already familiar with git internals?
perhaps http://www.kernel.org/pub/softwa
9 matches
Mail list logo
