Re: SysRq behavior

2000-12-17 Thread Tuomas Heino
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, James Simmons wrote: > > > When built into the Kernel, by only pressing the > > > PrintScreen/SysRq the current application is terminated (tested > > > on a console and GNU screen). Is this just me or I should > > > expect it? Well this should happen even when sysrq is NOT

Re: SysRq behavior

2000-12-17 Thread Tuomas Heino
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, James Simmons wrote: When built into the Kernel, by only pressing the PrintScreen/SysRq the current application is terminated (tested on a console and GNU screen). Is this just me or I should expect it? Well this should happen even when sysrq is NOT compiled

Re: SysRq behavior

2000-12-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Just played with this bug. It doesn't kill a login shell but does any > > app running on it. I just went looking for where "Quit" is printed > > out. When I press SysRq Quit is printed on the command line. Any ideas? > > Not a bug. Normally,. PrtSc will generate a ^\, which is the

Re: SysRq behavior

2000-12-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Just played with this bug. It doesn't kill a login shell but does any app running on it. I just went looking for where "Quit" is printed out. When I press SysRq Quit is printed on the command line. Any ideas? Not a bug. Normally,. PrtSc will generate a ^\, which is the default

Re: SysRq behavior

2000-12-11 Thread Alan Shutko
James Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just played with this bug. It doesn't kill a login shell but does any > app running on it. I just went looking for where "Quit" is printed > out. When I press SysRq Quit is printed on the command line. Any ideas? Not a bug. Normally,. PrtSc will

Re: SysRq behavior

2000-12-11 Thread James Simmons
> Hi! > > > I don't remember having the same problem months (6?) ago when > > I built my first Kernel with this enabled (well, maybe I never > > touched the key). > > > > When built into the Kernel, by only pressing the > > PrintScreen/SysRq the current application is terminated (tested > > on

Re: SysRq behavior

2000-12-11 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > I don't remember having the same problem months (6?) ago when > I built my first Kernel with this enabled (well, maybe I never > touched the key). > > When built into the Kernel, by only pressing the > PrintScreen/SysRq the current application is terminated (tested > on a console and GNU

Re: SysRq behavior

2000-12-11 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! I don't remember having the same problem months (6?) ago when I built my first Kernel with this enabled (well, maybe I never touched the key). When built into the Kernel, by only pressing the PrintScreen/SysRq the current application is terminated (tested on a console and GNU

Re: SysRq behavior

2000-12-11 Thread James Simmons
Hi! I don't remember having the same problem months (6?) ago when I built my first Kernel with this enabled (well, maybe I never touched the key). When built into the Kernel, by only pressing the PrintScreen/SysRq the current application is terminated (tested on a console and

Re: SysRq behavior

2000-12-11 Thread Alan Shutko
James Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just played with this bug. It doesn't kill a login shell but does any app running on it. I just went looking for where "Quit" is printed out. When I press SysRq Quit is printed on the command line. Any ideas? Not a bug. Normally,. PrtSc will generate

SysRq behavior

2000-12-08 Thread Frédéric L . W . Meunier
I don't remember having the same problem months (6?) ago when I built my first Kernel with this enabled (well, maybe I never touched the key). When built into the Kernel, by only pressing the PrintScreen/SysRq the current application is terminated (tested on a console and GNU screen). Is this

SysRq behavior

2000-12-08 Thread Frédéric L . W . Meunier
I don't remember having the same problem months (6?) ago when I built my first Kernel with this enabled (well, maybe I never touched the key). When built into the Kernel, by only pressing the PrintScreen/SysRq the current application is terminated (tested on a console and GNU screen). Is this