Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

> "Andrew" == Andrew James Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew> I updated my kernel more frequently after learning of ketchup. Andrew> (). The bother of getting the Andrew> patch sequence right and applying it was enough to discourage me. Andrew> No, it's

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On August 2, 2005 11:30 pm, Gene Heskett wrote: > And my point is that anyone with the skills to build a kernel > shouldn't have any problems at all find it with gftp. I updated my kernel more frequently after learning of ketchup. (). The bother of getting the

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Michael Krufky wrote: > > Why not just have the scripts plug values into a database, and have the > > html/php be formatted like Bodo suggests, and reads content from database? > > Very simple, less maintenance... Only requires 1 initial redesign, and

Re: Testing RC kernels

Michael Krufky napsal(a): 2.6.13-rc* patches apply against 2.6.12 NOT 2.6.12.x The best way to find out this, is to look into patch file on --- linux-2.6.13-rc4/Makefile line, a few lines below is -old version (to patch) and +new version as result ;). - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: Testing RC kernels

Michael Krufky napsal(a): 2.6.13-rc* patches apply against 2.6.12 NOT 2.6.12.x The best way to find out this, is to look into patch file on --- linux-2.6.13-rc4/Makefile line, a few lines below is -old version (to patch) and +new version as result ;). - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Michael Krufky wrote: Why not just have the scripts plug values into a database, and have the html/php be formatted like Bodo suggests, and reads content from database? Very simple, less maintenance... Only requires 1 initial redesign, and

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On August 2, 2005 11:30 pm, Gene Heskett wrote: And my point is that anyone with the skills to build a kernel shouldn't have any problems at all find it with gftp. I updated my kernel more frequently after learning of ketchup. (http://www.selenic.com/ketchup/). The bother of getting the patch

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

Andrew == Andrew James Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andrew I updated my kernel more frequently after learning of ketchup. Andrew (http://www.selenic.com/ketchup/). The bother of getting the Andrew patch sequence right and applying it was enough to discourage me. Andrew No, it's not

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

Michael Krufky wrote: Why not just have the scripts plug values into a database, and have the html/php be formatted like Bodo suggests, and reads content from database? Very simple, less maintenance... Only requires 1 initial redesign, and easier maintainence of the scripts that you speak of.

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

H. Peter Anvin wrote: Bodo Eggert wrote: I hacked some changes to create vogon-compatibility. Maybe you like it. I'm not completely happy, but it's too late now. Changes: - Make first column more terse - Move full download links to a seperate table, where they can be found. - Add headings

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

Bodo Eggert wrote: I hacked some changes to create vogon-compatibility. Maybe you like it. I'm not completely happy, but it's too late now. Changes: - Make first column more terse - Move full download links to a seperate table, where they can be found. - Add headings above the patches and

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On Tuesday 02 August 2005 22:13, Randy.Dunlap wrote: >> >I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really >> > needs to show more information about the rc kernels and how to >> > create them. We want more testers, but I wonder how many people >> > go through the above steps and

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 19:13 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > Was the request cc-ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (along with > the [KORG] in the subject line)? > I can't tell from the email archives. Yep, my first (and only?) post on this CC'ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I added [KORG] to the subject. Hopefully

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:04:16 -0400 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Tuesday 02 August 2005 15:21, Steven Rostedt wrote: > >On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:54 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > >> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:36 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > >> > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > >> > > On

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On Tuesday 02 August 2005 15:21, Steven Rostedt wrote: >On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:54 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: >> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:36 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: >> > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: >> > > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: >> > > > >> >

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

Sean Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really needs >> to show more information about the rc kernels and how to create them. >> We want more testers, but I wonder how many

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

Thanks for testing the RCs, we need more users to do that. If any of your hardware stops working, make sure to report it, don't assume that it will fix itself! Assume you're the first to notice the bug. I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really needs to show more

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

Sean Bruno wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really needs to show more information about the rc kernels and how to create them. We want more testers, but I wonder how many people go through the above

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really needs > to show more information about the rc kernels and how to create them. > We want more testers, but I wonder how many people go through the above > steps and just

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:54 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:36 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't

Re: Testing RC kernels

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:36 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't quite get the patches > > > applied cleanly. > > > > > > What

Re: Testing RC kernels

Sean Bruno wrote: I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't quite get the patches applied cleanly. What kernel version (full kernel source tar ball) should I be using to apply the patches(rc5) with? Is it 2.6.12.3? 2.6.13-rc* patches apply against 2.6.12 NOT 2.6.12.x -- Michael

Re: Testing RC kernels

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > > > > I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't quite get the patches > > applied cleanly. > > > > What kernel version (full kernel source tar ball) should I be using to > >

Re: Testing RC kernels

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't quite get the patches > applied cleanly. > > What kernel version (full kernel source tar ball) should I be using to > apply the patches(rc5) with? Is it 2.6.12.3? No, 2.6.12. Lee - To

Testing RC kernels

I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't quite get the patches applied cleanly. What kernel version (full kernel source tar ball) should I be using to apply the patches(rc5) with? Is it 2.6.12.3? Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

Testing RC kernels

noob question I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't quite get the patches applied cleanly. What kernel version (full kernel source tar ball) should I be using to apply the patches(rc5) with? Is it 2.6.12.3? /noob question Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: Testing RC kernels

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: noob question I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't quite get the patches applied cleanly. What kernel version (full kernel source tar ball) should I be using to apply the patches(rc5) with? Is it 2.6.12.3? No, 2.6.12. Lee

Re: Testing RC kernels

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: noob question I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't quite get the patches applied cleanly. What kernel version (full kernel source tar ball) should I be using to

Re: Testing RC kernels

Sean Bruno wrote: noob question I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't quite get the patches applied cleanly. What kernel version (full kernel source tar ball) should I be using to apply the patches(rc5) with? Is it 2.6.12.3? /noob question 2.6.13-rc* patches apply against

Re: Testing RC kernels

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:36 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: noob question I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't quite get the patches applied cleanly. What kernel

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:54 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:36 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: noob question I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't quite

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really needs to show more information about the rc kernels and how to create them. We want more testers, but I wonder how many people go through the above steps and just give up

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

Sean Bruno wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really needs to show more information about the rc kernels and how to create them. We want more testers, but I wonder how many people go through the above

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

Thanks for testing the RCs, we need more users to do that. If any of your hardware stops working, make sure to report it, don't assume that it will fix itself! Assume you're the first to notice the bug. I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really needs to show more

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

Sean Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really needs to show more information about the rc kernels and how to create them. We want more testers, but I wonder how many people go

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On Tuesday 02 August 2005 15:21, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:54 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:36 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: noob question

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:04:16 -0400 Gene Heskett wrote: On Tuesday 02 August 2005 15:21, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:54 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:36 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Tue,

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 19:13 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: Was the request cc-ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (along with the [KORG] in the subject line)? I can't tell from the email archives. Yep, my first (and only?) post on this CC'ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I added [KORG] to the subject. Hopefully it

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

On Tuesday 02 August 2005 22:13, Randy.Dunlap wrote: I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really needs to show more information about the rc kernels and how to create them. We want more testers, but I wonder how many people go through the above steps and just give up

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

Bodo Eggert wrote: I hacked some changes to create vogon-compatibility. Maybe you like it. I'm not completely happy, but it's too late now. Changes: - Make first column more terse - Move full download links to a seperate table, where they can be found. - Add h2 headings above the patches and

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

H. Peter Anvin wrote: Bodo Eggert wrote: I hacked some changes to create vogon-compatibility. Maybe you like it. I'm not completely happy, but it's too late now. Changes: - Make first column more terse - Move full download links to a seperate table, where they can be found. - Add h2

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

Michael Krufky wrote: Why not just have the scripts plug values into a database, and have the html/php be formatted like Bodo suggests, and reads content from database? Very simple, less maintenance... Only requires 1 initial redesign, and easier maintainence of the scripts that you speak of.