On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 09:29:33AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 07:57 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > >
> > > What was the next lines? I bet you it was "PASSED". Which means it did
> > > not fail. This is the second bug you found that has to do with RCU being
> > > called in
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 07:57 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >
> > What was the next lines? I bet you it was "PASSED". Which means it did
> > not fail. This is the second bug you found that has to do with RCU being
> > called in 'idle'. The one that Paul posted a patch for.
>
> Yeah, PASSED!
I have
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 08:09:38PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 16:57 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > > What was the next lines? I bet you it was "PASSED". Which means it did
> > > not fail. This is the second bug you found that has to do with RCU being
> > > called in
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 16:57 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > What was the next lines? I bet you it was "PASSED". Which means it did
> > not fail. This is the second bug you found that has to do with RCU being
> > called in 'idle'. The one that Paul posted a patch for.
>
> Though it needs anothe
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 07:51:39PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 07:43 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:13:39AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:50 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > > On 07/31/2012 03:43 PM, Steven Rostedt wrot
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 07:51:39PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 07:43 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:13:39AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:50 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > > On 07/31/2012 03:43 PM, Steven Rostedt wrot
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 07:43 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:13:39AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:50 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 07/31/2012 03:43 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > That would be better. A hypervisor might be real-time cap
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:13:39AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:50 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 07/31/2012 03:43 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > That would be better. A hypervisor might be real-time capable (with
> > some effort kvm can do this), so we don't want to
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:50 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 03:43 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> That would be better. A hypervisor might be real-time capable (with
> some effort kvm can do this), so we don't want to turn off real time
> features just based on that.
It would only turn off
On 07/31/2012 03:43 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:37 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 07/31/2012 03:17 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> >
>> > It's good to quickly get to the root cause :) Can we possibly detect
>> > whether we are in a virtual machine and hence skip this particular
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:37 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 03:17 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >
> > It's good to quickly get to the root cause :) Can we possibly detect
> > whether we are in a virtual machine and hence skip this particular
> > test case?
>
> cpu_has(&boot_cpu, X86_FEATURE_
On 07/31/2012 03:17 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>
> It's good to quickly get to the root cause :) Can we possibly detect
> whether we are in a virtual machine and hence skip this particular
> test case?
cpu_has(&boot_cpu, X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR)
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to
e same
> > kconfig.
> >
> > [2.320434] Testing tracer wakeup: PASSED
> > [ 2.840288] Testing tracer wakeup_rt: .. no entries found ..FAILED!
> > [3.280861] [ cut here ]
> > [3.281967] WARNING: at
> > /c/kernel-tests/s
g tracer wakeup_rt: .. no entries found ..FAILED!
> [3.280861] [ cut here ]
> [3.281967] WARNING: at /c/kernel-tests/src/linux/kernel/trace/trace.c:834
> register_tracer+0x1b0/0x270()
> [3.284162] Hardware name: Bochs
> [3.284933] Modules linked
_env_string+0x51/0x51
> [ 1.534883] [<4141b2d4>] i386_start_kernel+0x8a/0x8f
> [1.534883]
> [1.534883] ===
And this warning shows up in one of the dozens of boots, for the same
kconfig.
[2.320434] Testing tracer wakeup: PASSED
[2.84028
15 matches
Mail list logo
