Re: The 10ms averager in fair.c + granularity

2012-10-04 Thread el es
Hello, Uwaysi, Uwaysi Bin Kareem paradoxuncreated.com> writes: > > Ok at 100hz, granularity seems to work as expected. Actually 1000hz for > desktop seems to be a myth. I have less jitter with 100hz. Very nice. I > think jitter is 99.99% eliminated from doom 3 now. > > Peace Be With You! >

Re: The 10ms averager in fair.c + granularity

2012-10-03 Thread Uwaysi Bin Kareem
Ok at 100hz, granularity seems to work as expected. Actually 1000hz for desktop seems to be a myth. I have less jitter with 100hz. Very nice. I think jitter is 99.99% eliminated from doom 3 now. Peace Be With You! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in t

Re: The 10ms averager in fair.c + granularity

2012-10-02 Thread Uwaysi Bin Kareem
The 10 ms averager is not the only strange thing. Obviously there are some good things in this scheduler, since it performs quite well. But I am not criticising the good. But the documentation makes a distinction between desktop and server with the "resolution" parameter. I tried some value