Hi Marc
Before everyone gets pissed off and freaks out why
don't you ponder the question why rm won't delete all
the files in the directory. If you can't grasp that
then you're brain damaged.
Think big people. Say NO to vi!
At first I thought you've got a point here: you definitely _do_
Hi Marc
Before everyone gets pissed off and freaks out why
don't you ponder the question why rm won't delete all
the files in the directory. If you can't grasp that
then you're brain damaged.
Think big people. Say NO to vi!
At first I thought you've got a point here: you definitely _do_
Michael Tharp wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
The important point that you are missing here is that
the Linux world is willing to live with an rm command
that is broken and the Windows and DOS world isn't.
This isn't about the rm command it's about programming
standards. It's about that the Linux
Marc Perkel wrote:
> The important point that you are missing here is that
> the Linux world is willing to live with an rm command
> that is broken and the Windows and DOS world isn't.
> This isn't about the rm command it's about programming
> standards. It's about that the Linux community isn't
>
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 22:20:34 PDT, Marc Perkel said:
> Let me give you and example of the difference between
> Linux open source world brain damaged thinking and
> what it's like out here in the real world.
>
> Go to a directory with 10k files and type:
>
> rm *
>
> What do you get?
>
>
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 06:22 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> The important point that you are missing here is that
> the Linux world is willing to live with an rm command
> that is broken and the Windows and DOS world isn't.
no the important point is that you're an absolute horrible troll and are
--- Paolo Ornati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
> Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 20 years, a million programmers, tens of millions
> of
> > users and RM is BROKEN. Am I the only one who has
> a
> > problem with this? If so - I'm normal - and
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 20 years, a million programmers, tens of millions of
> users and RM is BROKEN. Am I the only one who has a
> problem with this? If so - I'm normal - and Linux is a
> cult.
Fixed in 2.6.23-rc (and not just for
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:07:01 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Remove the arg+env limit of MAX_ARG_PAGES by copying the strings
> >directly from the old mm into the new mm.
>
> Me wonders. Will that make the "checking for maximum length of command line
>
Words by Marc Perkel [Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 06:22:37AM -0700]:
>
> --- Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Jiri Slaby
> > wrote:
> > > Marc Perkel napsal(a):
> > > > Let me give you and example of the difference
> > between
> > > > Linux open
On Sunday 19 August 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > What does this have to do with rm command?
> Nothing, and no more with linux development. Marc confuses shell and rm.
> (please do not follow up on this OT thread, responses to
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 06:22:37AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> The important point that you are missing here is that
> the Linux world is willing to live with an rm command
> that is broken and the Windows and DOS world isn't.
The important point you are missing is that it is not the rm command
--- Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Jiri Slaby
> wrote:
> > Marc Perkel napsal(a):
> > > Let me give you and example of the difference
> between
> > > Linux open source world brain damaged thinking
> and
> > > what it's like out here in the
--- Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marc Perkel napsal(a):
> > Let me give you and example of the difference
> between
> > Linux open source world brain damaged thinking and
> > what it's like out here in the real world.
> >
> > Go to a directory with 10k files and type:
> >
> > rm *
>
On Aug 19 2007 14:39, Paolo Ornati wrote:
>> WT> Under unix, the shell resolves "*" and passes the 1 file names
>> WT> to the "rm" command. Now, execve() may fail because 1 names in
>> WT> arguments can require too much memory. That's why find and xargs
>> WT> were invented!
>>
>> It
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sunday 19 August 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
> > > > Let me give you and example of
>
> > > > brain damaged thinking
>
> > > > out here in the real world.
>
> > I tried Peyote once about 25 years ago and it was
> > fantastic.
>
> Sounds like it hasn't worn off
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:31:21 +0200
Benny Amorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "WT" == Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> WT> Under unix, the shell resolves "*" and passes the 1 file names
> WT> to the "rm" command. Now, execve() may fail because 1 names in
> WT>
> "WT" == Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
WT> Under unix, the shell resolves "*" and passes the 1 file names
WT> to the "rm" command. Now, execve() may fail because 1 names in
WT> arguments can require too much memory. That's why find and xargs
WT> were invented!
It would
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Marc Perkel napsal(a):
> > Let me give you and example of the difference between
> > Linux open source world brain damaged thinking and
> > what it's like out here in the real world.
> >
> > Go to a directory with 10k files and type:
>
On Sunday 19 August 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
> > > Let me give you and example of
> > > brain damaged thinking
> > > out here in the real world.
> I tried Peyote once about 25 years ago and it was
> fantastic.
Sounds like it hasn't worn off yet.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Marc Perkel napsal(a):
> Let me give you and example of the difference between
> Linux open source world brain damaged thinking and
> what it's like out here in the real world.
>
> Go to a directory with 10k files and type:
>
> rm *
>
> What do you get?
>
> /bin/rm: Argument list too long
--- Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:20:34PM -0700, Marc
> Perkel wrote:
> > Let me give you and example of the difference
> between
> > Linux open source world brain damaged thinking and
> > what it's like out here in the real world.
>
> [snip]
>
> Marc, why
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:20:34PM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Let me give you and example of the difference between
> Linux open source world brain damaged thinking and
> what it's like out here in the real world.
[snip]
Marc, why don't you do the obvious thing and hire Jeff Merkey?
He used to
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:20:34PM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Let me give you and example of the difference between
Linux open source world brain damaged thinking and
what it's like out here in the real world.
[snip]
Marc, why don't you do the obvious thing and hire Jeff Merkey?
He used to
--- Al Viro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 10:20:34PM -0700, Marc
Perkel wrote:
Let me give you and example of the difference
between
Linux open source world brain damaged thinking and
what it's like out here in the real world.
[snip]
Marc, why don't you do the
Marc Perkel napsal(a):
Let me give you and example of the difference between
Linux open source world brain damaged thinking and
what it's like out here in the real world.
Go to a directory with 10k files and type:
rm *
What do you get?
/bin/rm: Argument list too long
What does this
On Sunday 19 August 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
Let me give you and example of
snip
brain damaged thinking
snip
out here in the real world.
I tried Peyote once about 25 years ago and it was
fantastic.
Sounds like it hasn't worn off yet.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
Marc Perkel napsal(a):
Let me give you and example of the difference between
Linux open source world brain damaged thinking and
what it's like out here in the real world.
Go to a directory with 10k files and type:
rm *
WT == Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
WT Under unix, the shell resolves * and passes the 1 file names
WT to the rm command. Now, execve() may fail because 1 names in
WT arguments can require too much memory. That's why find and xargs
WT were invented!
It would be very handy if
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:31:21 +0200
Benny Amorsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WT == Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
WT Under unix, the shell resolves * and passes the 1 file names
WT to the rm command. Now, execve() may fail because 1 names in
WT arguments can require too much
On Aug 19 2007 14:39, Paolo Ornati wrote:
WT Under unix, the shell resolves * and passes the 1 file names
WT to the rm command. Now, execve() may fail because 1 names in
WT arguments can require too much memory. That's why find and xargs
WT were invented!
It would be very handy if
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 19 August 2007, Marc Perkel wrote:
Let me give you and example of
snip
brain damaged thinking
snip
out here in the real world.
I tried Peyote once about 25 years ago and it was
fantastic.
Sounds like it hasn't worn off yet.
Afreed.
--- Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc Perkel napsal(a):
Let me give you and example of the difference
between
Linux open source world brain damaged thinking and
what it's like out here in the real world.
Go to a directory with 10k files and type:
rm *
What do you
--- Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Jiri Slaby
wrote:
Marc Perkel napsal(a):
Let me give you and example of the difference
between
Linux open source world brain damaged thinking
and
what it's like out here in the real world.
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 06:22:37AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
The important point that you are missing here is that
the Linux world is willing to live with an rm command
that is broken and the Windows and DOS world isn't.
The important point you are missing is that it is not the rm command
On Sunday 19 August 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
What does this have to do with rm command?
Nothing, and no more with linux development. Marc confuses shell and rm.
(please do not follow up on this OT thread, responses to /dev/null)
Words by Marc Perkel [Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 06:22:37AM -0700]:
--- Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Jiri Slaby
wrote:
Marc Perkel napsal(a):
Let me give you and example of the difference
between
Linux open source world brain
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:07:01 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remove the arg+env limit of MAX_ARG_PAGES by copying the strings
directly from the old mm into the new mm.
Me wonders. Will that make the checking for maximum length of command line
arguments from
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
20 years, a million programmers, tens of millions of
users and RM is BROKEN. Am I the only one who has a
problem with this? If so - I'm normal - and Linux is a
cult.
Fixed in 2.6.23-rc (and not just for rm):
--- Paolo Ornati [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
20 years, a million programmers, tens of millions
of
users and RM is BROKEN. Am I the only one who has
a
problem with this? If so - I'm normal - and Linux
is a
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 06:22 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
The important point that you are missing here is that
the Linux world is willing to live with an rm command
that is broken and the Windows and DOS world isn't.
no the important point is that you're an absolute horrible troll and are
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 22:20:34 PDT, Marc Perkel said:
Let me give you and example of the difference between
Linux open source world brain damaged thinking and
what it's like out here in the real world.
Go to a directory with 10k files and type:
rm *
What do you get?
/bin/rm: Argument
Marc Perkel wrote:
The important point that you are missing here is that
the Linux world is willing to live with an rm command
that is broken and the Windows and DOS world isn't.
This isn't about the rm command it's about programming
standards. It's about that the Linux community isn't
Michael Tharp wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
The important point that you are missing here is that
the Linux world is willing to live with an rm command
that is broken and the Windows and DOS world isn't.
This isn't about the rm command it's about programming
standards. It's about that the Linux
Let me give you and example of the difference between
Linux open source world brain damaged thinking and
what it's like out here in the real world.
Go to a directory with 10k files and type:
rm *
What do you get?
/bin/rm: Argument list too long
If you map a network drive in DOS and type:
del
Let me give you and example of the difference between
Linux open source world brain damaged thinking and
what it's like out here in the real world.
Go to a directory with 10k files and type:
rm *
What do you get?
/bin/rm: Argument list too long
If you map a network drive in DOS and type:
del
46 matches
Mail list logo
