On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:42:10AM +0100, Nick Dyer wrote:
>> Hi-
>>
>> I'm trying to find out which subsystem maintainer I should be talking to -
>> apologies if I'm addressing the wrong people.
>>
>> There is a model for doi
> This sounds promising. The only sticking point I can see is that a touch
> frontend has many more channels (possibly thousands), which would seem to
> impose a lot of overhead when put into the IIO framework. I will certainly
> take a closer look at it.
If that is the case then it may not be the
On 21/10/14 13:22, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>> If you will have touch processing in a binary blob, you'll also be going
>> to ages "Works with Ubuntu 12.04 on x86_32!" (and nothing else), or
>> "Android 5.1.2 on Tegra Blah (build 78912KT)" (and nothing else).
>
> As well as not going upstream be
> If you will have touch processing in a binary blob, you'll also be going
> to ages "Works with Ubuntu 12.04 on x86_32!" (and nothing else), or
> "Android 5.1.2 on Tegra Blah (build 78912KT)" (and nothing else).
As well as not going upstream because there is no way anyone else can
test changes to
Hi!
> I'm trying to find out which subsystem maintainer I should be talking to -
> apologies if I'm addressing the wrong people.
>
> There is a model for doing touch processing where the touch controller
> becomes a much simpler device which sends out raw acquisitions (over SPI
> at up to 1Mbps
Hi Nick,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:42:10AM +0100, Nick Dyer wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I'm trying to find out which subsystem maintainer I should be talking to -
> apologies if I'm addressing the wrong people.
>
> There is a model for doing touch processing where the touch controller
> becomes a much sim
On October 17, 2014 11:42:10 AM GMT+01:00, Nick Dyer
wrote:
>Hi-
>
>I'm trying to find out which subsystem maintainer I should be talking
>to -
>apologies if I'm addressing the wrong people.
>
>There is a model for doing touch processing where the touch controller
>becomes a much simpler device
Hi-
I'm trying to find out which subsystem maintainer I should be talking to -
apologies if I'm addressing the wrong people.
There is a model for doing touch processing where the touch controller
becomes a much simpler device which sends out raw acquisitions (over SPI
at up to 1Mbps + protocol o
8 matches
Mail list logo