On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 10:35:14AM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> I've just looked at it, but I'm pretty sure this is a bug in your
> code.
Ick. Thanks!
Olaf
--
Olaf Kirch | --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we play
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |/ | \ sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah kin.ir
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 04:07:38PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 02:09:05PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > IP_PKTINFO does not allow to set source addresses, only destination
> > addresses. Source address depends on the boundage or the route.
>
> No. At least udp_sendmsg uses
Olaf Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 3. There seems to be a bug somewhere in the handling of poll().
> If you observe the traceroute process with strace, you'll
> notice that it starts spinning madly after receiving the
> first bunch of packets (those with ttl 1).
>
>
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 02:09:05PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> IP_PKTINFO does not allow to set source addresses, only destination
> addresses. Source address depends on the boundage or the route.
No. At least udp_sendmsg uses the spec_dst_addr field as the source
address. I added some code to m
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 01:50:19PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wrote a small traceroute last night that works mostly like the
> LBL one, except it doesn't need an s bit anymore :)
It already existed in Alexey's iputils (tracepath).
> There are three things that puzzle me, however
Hi all,
I wrote a small traceroute last night that works mostly like the
LBL one, except it doesn't need an s bit anymore :)
Since the source code is small, I'm attaching it to this mail.
Note that it requires a 2.4 linux kernel and possibly a recent
glibc (not sure of that).
Most of the featu
6 matches
Mail list logo
