On 10/15/2013 01:42:56 AM, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
You have a piece of code under the GPL and the majority of the
copyright holders say they will not enforce it. Thats virtually public
domain code. Thats why i stopped contributing to the linux
On 10/15/2013 01:42:56 AM, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
You have a piece of code under the GPL and the majority of the
copyright holders say they will not enforce it. Thats virtually public
domain code. Thats why i stopped contributing
On Tue 2013-10-15 07:42:56, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> >>
> >> I dont think the majority of linux kernel developers care about
> >> enforcement at all. Its virtually public domain as far as i can see,
> >> Linus himself will not run after
> I was led to believe this in the busybox list. maybe we are communally
> smoking the same stuff. Linux Kernel Developers would rather go on
> developing better code than waste time on enforcement. Some even think
> it is counter productive to adoption of linux.
>
> Transcend most likely knows
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>
>> I dont think the majority of linux kernel developers care about
>> enforcement at all. Its virtually public domain as far as i can see,
>> Linus himself will not run after violators.
>>
>> Any company out there is free to do what they
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
I dont think the majority of linux kernel developers care about
enforcement at all. Its virtually public domain as far as i can see,
Linus himself will not run after violators.
Any company out there is free to do what they
I was led to believe this in the busybox list. maybe we are communally
smoking the same stuff. Linux Kernel Developers would rather go on
developing better code than waste time on enforcement. Some even think
it is counter productive to adoption of linux.
Transcend most likely knows this.
On Tue 2013-10-15 07:42:56, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
I dont think the majority of linux kernel developers care about
enforcement at all. Its virtually public domain as far as i can see,
Linus himself will not run after
On Tue 2013-10-08 17:08:22, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:29 PM, luke.leighton
> wrote:
> > this is a quick message to let people know that evidence has been
> > collected of not just knowingly-infringing copyright but *blatant*
> > copyright infringment [a la "bring it on,
On Tue 2013-10-08 17:08:22, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:29 PM, luke.leighton luke.leigh...@gmail.com
wrote:
this is a quick message to let people know that evidence has been
collected of not just knowingly-infringing copyright but *blatant*
copyright infringment [a
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:29 PM, luke.leighton wrote:
> this is a quick message to let people know that evidence has been
> collected of not just knowingly-infringing copyright but *blatant*
> copyright infringment [a la "bring it on, fuckers"] by transcend
> technologies. does anyone have any
Hi!
> this is a quick message to let people know that evidence has been
> collected of not just knowingly-infringing copyright but *blatant*
> copyright infringment [a la "bring it on, fuckers"] by transcend
> technologies. does anyone have any recommendations as to whom should
> be contacted in
Hi!
this is a quick message to let people know that evidence has been
collected of not just knowingly-infringing copyright but *blatant*
copyright infringment [a la bring it on, fuckers] by transcend
technologies. does anyone have any recommendations as to whom should
be contacted in order
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:29 PM, luke.leighton luke.leigh...@gmail.com wrote:
this is a quick message to let people know that evidence has been
collected of not just knowingly-infringing copyright but *blatant*
copyright infringment [a la bring it on, fuckers] by transcend
technologies. does
this is a quick message to let people know that evidence has been
collected of not just knowingly-infringing copyright but *blatant*
copyright infringment [a la "bring it on, fuckers"] by transcend
technologies. does anyone have any recommendations as to whom should
be contacted in order to
this is a quick message to let people know that evidence has been
collected of not just knowingly-infringing copyright but *blatant*
copyright infringment [a la bring it on, fuckers] by transcend
technologies. does anyone have any recommendations as to whom should
be contacted in order to pursue
16 matches
Mail list logo
