On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 15:20 +, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> Also, is it possible bypass SCSI stacks and go into directly UFS stack?
Hello Bean,
Sorry but I think it would be wrong to bypass the block layer when submitting
UFS commands. My understanding is that UFS devices are used in systems w
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 03:44:19PM +, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> Hi, greg k-h
>
> >
> >So what UFS commands are you missing that you need to see implemented?
> >
> >And again, have you checked the different forks of the driver?
> >
>
> Seems there is something misunderstood, I want to use UP
Hi, greg k-h
>
>So what UFS commands are you missing that you need to see implemented?
>
>And again, have you checked the different forks of the driver?
>
Seems there is something misunderstood, I want to use UPIU, rather than CDB.
Maybe it is not possible based on current UFS stacks. Of course,
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:20:34PM +, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> Hi, Bart
> Sorry for later!
> >
> >Hello Bean,
> >
> >Please be more specific. What is inconvenient about sg3_utils on embedded
> >ARM systems?
> >
> Exactly, I don't know how to compile sg3_utils with static library, instead
>
Hi, Bart
Sorry for later!
>
>Hello Bean,
>
>Please be more specific. What is inconvenient about sg3_utils on embedded
>ARM systems?
>
Exactly, I don't know how to compile sg3_utils with static library, instead of
sharing library. I used following configuration
Parameter:
./configure --enable-stati
Hi,
On 11/30/17, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> Hi, Greg
>
>>On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:25:47AM +, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
>>> Hi, all
>>> Is there someone knows if exists one utilis dedicated to UFS device,
>>> rather
>>than SCSI utils?
>>> I have tried sg3-utils, but it is not convenient for
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 15:39 +, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> Thread-Topic: UFS utilities
> Thread-Index: AdNpKDYJWTPjczfxQHC/pD9WNnnl4w==
Could you fix your mail transfer agent? It's using these non standard
headers instead of the RFC mandated In-Reply-To: and References:
The prob
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 03:39:19PM +, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> Hi, Greg
>
> >On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:25:47AM +, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> >> Hi, all
> >> Is there someone knows if exists one utilis dedicated to UFS device, rather
> >than SCSI utils?
> >> I have tried sg3-utils, but
Hi, Greg
>On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:25:47AM +, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
>> Hi, all
>> Is there someone knows if exists one utilis dedicated to UFS device, rather
>than SCSI utils?
>> I have tried sg3-utils, but it is not convenient for the embedded ARM-based
>system.
>> And also it doesn't s
On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 11:25 +, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> Is there someone knows if exists one utilis dedicated to UFS device,
> rather than SCSI utils? I have tried sg3-utils, but it is not convenient
> for the embedded ARM-based system.
Hello Bean,
Please be more specific. What is inconven
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:25:47AM +, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> Hi, all
> Is there someone knows if exists one utilis dedicated to UFS device, rather
> than SCSI utils?
> I have tried sg3-utils, but it is not convenient for the embedded ARM-based
> system.
> And also it doesn't support sev
Hi, all
Is there someone knows if exists one utilis dedicated to UFS device, rather
than SCSI utils?
I have tried sg3-utils, but it is not convenient for the embedded ARM-based
system.
And also it doesn't support several UFS special command.
If we don't have this kind of tool for UFS, is it nec
12 matches
Mail list logo
