Hello Nicolas,
> I fear that my bug-report yesterday was very badly written, with me writing
> to the wrong mailing-list and all.
>
> I was saying:
>
>> I found a type mismatch in UML that makes host block devices unusable as ubd
>> devices on x86_64 and other 64 bits systems (segfault of the mm
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 02:42:47PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> I found a type mismatch in UML that makes host block devices unusable as ubd
> devices on x86_64 and other 64 bits systems (segfault of the mm subsystem):
Looks sane, can I have a properly Signed-off-by: version of the patch?
Hi.
I found a type mismatch in UML that makes host block devices unusable as ubd
devices on x86_64 and other 64 bits systems (segfault of the mm subsystem):
In block/ioctl.c, the following lines show that the BLKGETSIZE ioctl expects
a pointer to a long:
case BLKGETSIZE:
3 matches
Mail list logo