On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > > usb_hcd_flush_endpoint() has a retry loop that starts with a
> > > spin_lock_irq(),
> > > but only gives up the spinlock, not the irq_disable
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > usb_hcd_flush_endpoint() has a retry loop that starts with a
> > spin_lock_irq(),
> > but only gives up the spinlock, not the irq_disable before jumping to the
> > rescan label.
> >
> >
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> usb_hcd_flush_endpoint() has a retry loop that starts with a spin_lock_irq(),
> but only gives up the spinlock, not the irq_disable before jumping to the
> rescan label.
>
> Split the spin_lock_irq into the retryable part and the local_irq_disable()
> t
usb_hcd_flush_endpoint() has a retry loop that starts with a spin_lock_irq(),
but only gives up the spinlock, not the irq_disable before jumping to the
rescan label.
Split the spin_lock_irq into the retryable part and the local_irq_disable()
that is only done once as a micro-optimization and sligh
4 matches
Mail list logo
