On Thursday 10 January 2013 10:20:42 Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > In the long run it is probably a good idea to pass duplicated URBs to
> > usbmon by
> > a special code path.
>
> I'd prefer to add extra information to the WARN_ONCE message. Even
> though
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Thursday 10 January 2013 00:05:55 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> > I've had a quick look at the trace posted at
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879462 but usbmon only shows
> > URBs
> > that are successfully submitted. I'm not sure
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Tuesday 08 January 2013 11:03:22 Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:51:20AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > We've had a few reports in Fedora of users
On Thursday 10 January 2013 13:13:58 Ming Lei wrote:
> IMO, there is a minor fault in the error handling path of
> uvc_status_start() inside uvc_v4l2_open(), and the 'users' count
> should have been decreased before usb_autopm_put_interface().
> In theory, the warning can be triggered when the
On Thursday 10 January 2013 00:05:55 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> I've had a quick look at the trace posted at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879462 but usbmon only shows URBs
> that are successfully submitted. I'm not sure what useful information I could
> get from the trace.
The
On Thursday 10 January 2013 10:20:42 Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Oliver Neukum wrote:
In the long run it is probably a good idea to pass duplicated URBs to
usbmon by
a special code path.
I'd prefer to add extra information to the WARN_ONCE message. Even
though it would
On Thursday 10 January 2013 00:05:55 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
I've had a quick look at the trace posted at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879462 but usbmon only shows URBs
that are successfully submitted. I'm not sure what useful information I could
get from the trace.
The
On Thursday 10 January 2013 13:13:58 Ming Lei wrote:
IMO, there is a minor fault in the error handling path of
uvc_status_start() inside uvc_v4l2_open(), and the 'users' count
should have been decreased before usb_autopm_put_interface().
In theory, the warning can be triggered when the device
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Josh,
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 11:03:22 Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:51:20AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi,
We've had a few reports in Fedora of users hitting the WARN_ONCE
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2013 00:05:55 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
I've had a quick look at the trace posted at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879462 but usbmon only shows
URBs
that are successfully submitted. I'm not sure what useful
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> I've never heard of such problems with the uvcvideo driver, and I don't see
> anything wrong with the code at first sight. The driver only submits URBs when
IMO, there is a minor fault in the error handling path of
uvc_status_start()
Hi Josh,
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 11:03:22 Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:51:20AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We've had a few reports in Fedora of users hitting the WARN_ONCE in
> > > drivers/usb/core/urb.c that
Hi Josh,
On Tuesday 08 January 2013 11:03:22 Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:51:20AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi,
We've had a few reports in Fedora of users hitting the WARN_ONCE in
drivers/usb/core/urb.c that prints a warning
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com wrote:
I've never heard of such problems with the uvcvideo driver, and I don't see
anything wrong with the code at first sight. The driver only submits URBs when
IMO, there is a minor fault in the error
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:51:20AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We've had a few reports in Fedora of users hitting the WARN_ONCE in
> > drivers/usb/core/urb.c that prints a warning about a usb_submit_urb
> > being called on an active URB.
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've had a few reports in Fedora of users hitting the WARN_ONCE in
> drivers/usb/core/urb.c that prints a warning about a usb_submit_urb
> being called on an active URB. One of them[1] is from the ums_realtek
> driver and the other[2] is from the
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi,
We've had a few reports in Fedora of users hitting the WARN_ONCE in
drivers/usb/core/urb.c that prints a warning about a usb_submit_urb
being called on an active URB. One of them[1] is from the ums_realtek
driver and the other[2] is from the
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:51:20AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi,
We've had a few reports in Fedora of users hitting the WARN_ONCE in
drivers/usb/core/urb.c that prints a warning about a usb_submit_urb
being called on an active URB. One of them[1]
Hi,
We've had a few reports in Fedora of users hitting the WARN_ONCE in
drivers/usb/core/urb.c that prints a warning about a usb_submit_urb
being called on an active URB. One of them[1] is from the ums_realtek
driver and the other[2] is from the uvcvideo driver. However, I noticed
that in both
Hi,
We've had a few reports in Fedora of users hitting the WARN_ONCE in
drivers/usb/core/urb.c that prints a warning about a usb_submit_urb
being called on an active URB. One of them[1] is from the ums_realtek
driver and the other[2] is from the uvcvideo driver. However, I noticed
that in both
20 matches
Mail list logo
