Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

2001-02-10 Thread Dag Wieers
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: >> Rejected. It is meant not to be there. > > To be more specific ... __bad_udelay() is meant to be an > unresolvable symbol, which is referenced when people call > udelay with a "wrong" timeout. Maybe this (and similar situations) could be added to the

Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

2001-02-10 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as > > described below. > > Rejected. It is meant not to be there. To be more specific ... __bad_udelay() is meant to be an unresolvable symbol, which is referenced when people call

Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

2001-02-10 Thread Alan Cox
> I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as > described below. Rejected. It is meant not to be there. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at

Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

2001-02-10 Thread Dag Wieers
Hey, I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as described below. (For those in favor of .lost+found/, raise your hand ;)) --- drivers/net/pcmcia/wavelan_cs.c.origSat Feb 10 18:19:13 2001 +++ drivers/net/pcmcia/wavelan_cs.c Sat Feb 10 18:18:01 2001 @@

Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

2001-02-10 Thread Dag Wieers
Hey, I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as described below. (For those in favor of .lost+found/, raise your hand ;)) --- drivers/net/pcmcia/wavelan_cs.c.origSat Feb 10 18:19:13 2001 +++ drivers/net/pcmcia/wavelan_cs.c Sat Feb 10 18:18:01 2001 @@

Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

2001-02-10 Thread Alan Cox
I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as described below. Rejected. It is meant not to be there. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

2001-02-10 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote: I noticed a single unresolved symbol in wavelan_cs.o and I fixed it as described below. Rejected. It is meant not to be there. To be more specific ... __bad_udelay() is meant to be an unresolvable symbol, which is referenced when people call udelay

Re: Unresolved symbols for wavelan_cs in 2.4.1-ac9

2001-02-10 Thread Dag Wieers
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: Rejected. It is meant not to be there. To be more specific ... __bad_udelay() is meant to be an unresolvable symbol, which is referenced when people call udelay with a "wrong" timeout. Maybe this (and similar situations) could be added to the