Re: FIXED! Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resource collisions (fwd)

2000-10-25 Thread Jeff Epler
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 12:20:58PM -0400, jamal wrote: > + child->resource[0,1,2] = dev->bus->resource[0,1,2]; Did C change while I was asleep, or is this statement equivalent to child->resource[2] = dev->bus->resource[2]; ? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resource collisions (fwd)

2000-10-25 Thread Martin Mares
Hello! [Sorry for the delay, I've been ill for two weeks and now I'm trying hard to catch up with the huge pile of mail...] > I'm not certain of the details but I do know that it is legal. > To date I've only heard of it on ISA bridges, in particular the PIIXE. > It's some kind of passive listen

Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resource collisions (fwd)

2000-10-24 Thread Eric W. Biederman
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:50:10 -0700 (PDT) >From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Does the above make it work for you? I don't know if PCI even has >the notion of transparent bridging, and quite frankly I doubt it >do