On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:12:13PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 10:30 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Thomas,
> >
> > Ben Hutchings asked me if we still need "genirq: Disable random call on
> > preempt-rt" for -rt? With commit 902c098a366 "random: use lockless
> > techniqu
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 10:30 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> Ben Hutchings asked me if we still need "genirq: Disable random call on
> preempt-rt" for -rt? With commit 902c098a366 "random: use lockless
> techniques in the interrupt path" there is no more locks used. But does
> it still p
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Ben Hutchings asked me if we still need "genirq: Disable random call on
> preempt-rt" for -rt? With commit 902c098a366 "random: use lockless
> techniques in the interrupt path" there is no more locks used. But does
> it still produce high latencies?
Hav
Thomas,
Ben Hutchings asked me if we still need "genirq: Disable random call on
preempt-rt" for -rt? With commit 902c098a366 "random: use lockless
techniques in the interrupt path" there is no more locks used. But does
it still produce high latencies?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
4 matches
Mail list logo