Re: VAIO EEPROM support in at24

2020-08-07 Thread Jean Delvare
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:36:55 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > 1* Do we actually need to use a struct resource? With the current >requirements, that looks overkill to me. We really only need the >start and end offsets of the masked area (or start and length). Or >do you plan to ever support

Re: VAIO EEPROM support in at24

2020-08-06 Thread Jean Delvare
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 20:14:28 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 4:36 PM Jean Delvare wrote: > > I finally found the time to give it a try. Here's what my (tested) > > prototype looks like: > > Hi Jean, > > this looks good at first glance. > > > ---

Re: VAIO EEPROM support in at24

2020-08-05 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Bartosz, On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:32:56 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > wt., 17 mar 2020 o 15:14 Jean Delvare napisał(a): > > Before I start implementing the idea above, I would like to know if > > anyone objects to it, or has a better idea? > > Sounds good to me in general but isn't it

Re: VAIO EEPROM support in at24

2020-08-05 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 4:36 PM Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi Bartosz, > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:32:56 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > wt., 17 mar 2020 o 15:14 Jean Delvare napisał(a): > > > Before I start implementing the idea above, I would like to know if > > > anyone objects to it, or has

Re: VAIO EEPROM support in at24

2020-08-03 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Wolfram, Sorry, somehow this message of yours slipped through the cracks. On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:01:42 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > And we could introduce a new macro called AT24_CHIP_DATA_MASKED that > > would automacially set the AT24_FLAG_MASKED_RANGE flag and take > > another argument