Re: VIA VT82C686X

2001-01-31 Thread alex
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:13:21PM -0500, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > Even though the motherboard *should* perform the same regardless of the amount > of RAM, it may not. Physically, the refresh needs higher current drive when > there are more modules. I have seen a BIOS option to set the DRAM

Re: VIA VT82C686X

2001-01-31 Thread Stephen Wille Padnos
Byron Stanoszek wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote: > > > I removed the ide and ata setting. System is running stably as in no > > kernel crashes, but I am getting daemon and shell crashes. With this > > current kernel I've had 1 kernel crash in about 3 hours as compared to 1 >

Re: VIA VT82C686X

2001-01-31 Thread Byron Stanoszek
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote: > I removed the ide and ata setting. System is running stably as in no > kernel crashes, but I am getting daemon and shell crashes. With this > current kernel I've had 1 kernel crash in about 3 hours as compared to 1 > every 10 or 15 minutes. Crash, r

Re: VIA VT82C686X

2001-01-30 Thread Andre Hedrick
You system did something funny or the new VIA code did it. But because you observed this pattern the new feature that on Linux has kicked in and hopefull recovered the system for you. On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, [iso-8859-1] Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote: > Me too. But I couldn't get UDMA 66 after chan

Re: VIA VT82C686X

2001-01-30 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote: > > Woohoo! Just found out that ATA66 on the VIA aint too great. > > I set the kernel boot options idebus=66 ide0=ata66 enabling ATA66 Sorry but you are not right in this world ... Where in you manual does is "QUOTE" you can drive the ATA/IDE

Re: VIA VT82C686X

2001-01-30 Thread David D.W. Downey
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Byron Stanoszek wrote: > (unless you're overclocking). Setting it to 66 will cause the VIA driver to > believe your PCI bus is running at 66MHz and will program the IDE controller to > run at half the speed to maintain 33MHz. In reality, your controller now runs > at 16. I

Re: VIA VT82C686X

2001-01-30 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
Me too. But I couldn't get UDMA 66 after changing my BIOS settings and booting. With 33 it's very stable (what I used with 2.4.0). A diff: -hda: 30015216 sectors (15368 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=1868/255/63, UDMA(33) +hda: 30015216 sectors (15368 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=1868/255/63, UDMA(66) ...

Re: VIA VT82C686X

2001-01-30 Thread Byron Stanoszek
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote: > > Woohoo! Just found out that ATA66 on the VIA aint too great. > > I set the kernel boot options idebus=66 ide0=ata66 enabling ATA66 > according to dmesg. The HDD is a WDC UDMA100 30.5GB drive. I retried the The 'idebus=xx' parameter doesn't refe

VIA VT82C686X

2001-01-30 Thread David D.W. Downey
Woohoo! Just found out that ATA66 on the VIA aint too great. I set the kernel boot options idebus=66 ide0=ata66 enabling ATA66 according to dmesg. The HDD is a WDC UDMA100 30.5GB drive. I retried the dd if=/dev/hda7 of=/tmp/testing2.img bs=1024k count=2000 on one VT, ran renice -20 on the dd