On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 01:03:26AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > If anybody as a good idea to make this code auto-balancing,
> > > please let me know.
> >
> > I have no idea for auto-balancing but another idea: It's one possibility
> > to let the user
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 01:03:26AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > If anybody as a good idea to make this code auto-balancing,
> > please let me know.
>
> I have no idea for auto-balancing but another idea: It's one possibility
> to let the user choose when doing "make *config" what he wants:
>
>
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 01:03:26AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
If anybody as a good idea to make this code auto-balancing,
please let me know.
I have no idea for auto-balancing but another idea: It's one possibility
to let the user choose when doing "make *config" what he wants:
- A VM
On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 01:03:26AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
If anybody as a good idea to make this code auto-balancing,
please let me know.
I have no idea for auto-balancing but another idea: It's one possibility
to let the user choose when
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
>
> > The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused
> > some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got
> > 160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused
some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got
160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively large
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> If anybody as a good idea to make this code auto-balancing,
> please let me know.
(I haven't seen even one suggestion posted.. must be a real bugger)
I haven't found any silver bullets ;) but the one line bend-adjust
below does help the cache problem
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
If anybody as a good idea to make this code auto-balancing,
please let me know.
(I haven't seen even one suggestion posted.. must be a real bugger)
I haven't found any silver bullets ;) but the one line bend-adjust
below does help the cache problem a
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Joseph Bueno wrote:
> Rik van Riel a écrit :
> > On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
> >
> > > The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused
> > > some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got
> > > 160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1
Rik van Riel a écrit :
>
> On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
>
> > The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused
> > some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got
> > 160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively large
> > amounts
Rik van Riel a crit :
On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused
some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got
160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively large
amounts of it for
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Joseph Bueno wrote:
Rik van Riel a crit :
On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused
some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got
160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be
On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
> The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused
> some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got
> 160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively large
> amounts of it for buffers and cache while
Hiya.
The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused
some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got
160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively large
amounts of it for buffers and cache while pushing stuff out to
swap. This means
Hiya.
The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused
some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got
160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively large
amounts of it for buffers and cache while pushing stuff out to
swap. This means
On 23 Feb 2001, Adam Sampson wrote:
The VM balancing updates in the recent ac kernels seem to have caused
some interesting performance problems on my desktop machine. I've got
160Mb of RAM, and 2.4.2-ac1 appears to be using excessively large
amounts of it for buffers and cache while pushing
16 matches
Mail list logo
