-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, Richard B. Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Now just a cotton-picken minute. When was the last time you
> accessed that site? I spent most of last night looking through
> EMPTY directories with files that are invisible to ftp
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
root> See attached. "Just because you can see the candy doesn't mean
root> they'll let you have any"
Richard, I just cut & pasted this from your attachment:
"Please note that the directory structure on ftp.gnu.org was
redisorganzied fairly
Did you a make clean/mrproper before?
I usually do, and the kernel runs fine.
-mirabilos
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12+(proprietary extensions) # Updated:20010129 nick=mirabilos
GO/S d@ s--: a--- C++ UL P--- L++$(-^lang) E(joe) W+(++) loc=.de
N? o K? w-(+$) O+>+++ M-- V-
"Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Sean Hunter wrote:
>
> Okay! I'm answering the guy who gave me the kindest response.
> The rest of you guys can just hold your belly.
>
> Right. I'm getting blind. Been typing the same error
> every time I tried the site.
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The subject says it all. `make dep`
"Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> See attached. "Just because you can see the candy doesn't mean
> they'll let you have any"
[output of README when you connect:]
> Please note that the directory structure on ftp.gnu.org was redisorganzied
> fairly recently, such that
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Sean Hunter wrote:
Okay! I'm answering the guy who gave me the kindest response.
The rest of you guys can just hold your belly.
Right. I'm getting blind. Been typing the same error
every time I tried the site.
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.1 on an i686
> ftp> ls mak*
>
> make:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 ftp ftp 1030393 Jun 24 2000 make-3.79.1.tar.gz
>
> ftp> get make-3.79.1.tar.gz
>
get make/make-3.79.1.tar.gz
You missed the make: it did just before it listed the contents of make/
Just tried it myself with make/make-3.79.1.tar.gz,
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, David Woodhouse wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > ftp> cd gnu
> > ftp> ls
> > ftp> ls mak*
> > ftp> bin
> > ftp> get make-3.79.1.tar.gz
> > ftp> get make-3.79.1.tar.gz
> > ftp> exit
>
> Try typing 'pwd' instead of 'exit' at the end of this script.
He must have "spent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> ftp> cd gnu
> ftp> ls
> ftp> ls mak*
> ftp> bin
> ftp> get make-3.79.1.tar.gz
> ftp> get make-3.79.1.tar.gz
> ftp> exit
Try typing 'pwd' instead of 'exit' at the end of this script.
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Just a thought, how about 'cd make' before you do the get?
/Anders
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> See attached. "Just because you can see the candy doesn't mean
> they'll let you have any"
Thanks for confirming (once again) your status as a
person-who-can't-even-bother-to-figure-out-how-ls-works
Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> > > > I cannot find the source for GNU Make 3.77+
> > >
> > > I have a hard time believing that you
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > > I cannot find the source for GNU Make 3.77+
> >
> > I have a hard time believing that you don't have
> > the skills to go to ftp.gnu.org and
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> >
> > I cannot find the source for GNU Make 3.77+ Does anybody know were
> > it is now? Also, for a long time, I have been trying to find
> > the source for bison "yacc".
> >
>
> I'd wonder if
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > >
> > > > The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
> > >
> > > It worked fine here, with
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> I cannot find the source for GNU Make 3.77+ Does anybody know were
> it is now? Also, for a long time, I have been trying to find
> the source for bison "yacc".
>
I'd wonder if you actually know where the Free Software Foundation's
servers
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
> >
> > It worked fine here, with 2.4.1 unpacked from the tarball.
>
> I cannot find the
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> > The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
>
> It worked fine here, with 2.4.1 unpacked from the tarball.
>
> Rik
> --
I cannot find the source for GNU Make 3.77+ Does anybody know were
it
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
It worked fine here, with 2.4.1 unpacked from the tarball.
Rik
--
I cannot find the source for GNU Make 3.77+ Does anybody know were
it is now?
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
It worked fine here, with 2.4.1 unpacked from the tarball.
I cannot find the source for GNU
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
I cannot find the source for GNU Make 3.77+ Does anybody know were
it is now? Also, for a long time, I have been trying to find
the source for bison "yacc".
I'd wonder if you actually know where the Free Software Foundation's
servers lie...
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
It worked fine here, with 2.4.1 unpacked from
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Michael B. Trausch wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
I cannot find the source for GNU Make 3.77+ Does anybody know were
it is now? Also, for a long time, I have been trying to find
the source for bison "yacc".
I'd wonder if you actually
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
I cannot find the source for GNU Make 3.77+
I have a hard time believing that you don't have
the skills to go to ftp.gnu.org and download the
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
I cannot find the source for GNU Make 3.77+
I have a hard time believing that you don't have
the
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
See attached. "Just because you can see the candy doesn't mean
they'll let you have any"
Thanks for confirming (once again) your status as a
person-who-can't-even-bother-to-figure-out-how-ls-works
Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you
Just a thought, how about 'cd make' before you do the get?
/Anders
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
ftp cd gnu
ftp ls
ftp ls mak*
ftp bin
ftp get make-3.79.1.tar.gz
ftp get make-3.79.1.tar.gz
ftp exit
Try typing 'pwd' instead of 'exit' at the end of this script.
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
Did you a make clean/mrproper before?
I usually do, and the kernel runs fine.
-mirabilos
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12+(proprietary extensions) # Updated:20010129 nick=mirabilos
GO/S d@ s--: a--- C++ UL P--- L++$(-^lang) E(joe) W+(++) loc=.de
N? o K? w-(+$) O M-- V-
[Richard B. Johnson]
> Bob Tracy found the problem: the second ':' really needs to be
> escaped even though newer versions of make allow what was written.
> -$(MODINCL)/%.ver: CFLAGS := -I./include $(CFLAGS)
> +$(MODINCL)/%.ver: CFLAGS \:= -I./include $(CFLAGS)
No, that's a workaround in that
On Tuesday, January 30, 2001 03:42:36 PM -0800 "Brett G. Person"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Worked fine here but i am getting segfaults on my Reiser filesystems.
> I've been distracted by a project over the last few days. Is what I'm
> seeing a symptom of the fs corruption people were
Worked fine here but i am getting segfaults on my Reiser filesystems.
I've been distracted by a project over the last few days. Is what I'm
seeing a symptom of the fs corruption people were talking about last week?
Brett G. Person
415-358-2656
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Penguin Computing - The World's
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:09:48 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
>> You mean that nobody reads Documentation/Changes any more?
>
>Seldom, only once or twice a day. Guess that's not often enough
>to keep up on the new tool
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:57:44 -0500 (EST),
> "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
> >> "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >The
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
> > "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
> > >make[4]: Entering directory
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:57:44 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
>> "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
>>
"Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
> > "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
> > >make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.1/drivers/acpi'
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
> "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
> >make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.1/drivers/acpi'
> >Makefile:29: *** target pattern
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
>make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.1/drivers/acpi'
>Makefile:29: *** target pattern contains no `%'. Stop.
Which version of make are you
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
It worked fine here, with 2.4.1 unpacked from the tarball.
Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.1/arch/i386/boot'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `dep'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.1/arch/i386/boot'
scripts/mkdep init/*.c > .depend
scripts/mkdep `find
The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.1/arch/i386/boot'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `dep'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.1/arch/i386/boot'
scripts/mkdep init/*.c .depend
scripts/mkdep `find
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
It worked fine here, with 2.4.1 unpacked from the tarball.
Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.1/drivers/acpi'
Makefile:29: *** target pattern contains no `%'. Stop.
Which version of make are you
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.1/drivers/acpi'
Makefile:29: *** target pattern contains no
"Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.1/drivers/acpi'
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:57:44 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
make[4]: Entering
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
make[4]: Entering directory
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:57:44 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The subject says it all.
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:09:48 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
You mean that nobody reads Documentation/Changes any more?
Seldom, only once or twice a day. Guess that's not often enough
to keep up on the new tool requirements.
Worked fine here but i am getting segfaults on my Reiser filesystems.
I've been distracted by a project over the last few days. Is what I'm
seeing a symptom of the fs corruption people were talking about last week?
Brett G. Person
415-358-2656
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Penguin Computing - The World's
On Tuesday, January 30, 2001 03:42:36 PM -0800 "Brett G. Person"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Worked fine here but i am getting segfaults on my Reiser filesystems.
I've been distracted by a project over the last few days. Is what I'm
seeing a symptom of the fs corruption people were talking
[Richard B. Johnson]
Bob Tracy found the problem: the second ':' really needs to be
escaped even though newer versions of make allow what was written.
-$(MODINCL)/%.ver: CFLAGS := -I./include $(CFLAGS)
+$(MODINCL)/%.ver: CFLAGS \:= -I./include $(CFLAGS)
No, that's a workaround in that it
55 matches
Mail list logo