On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
> 2012/7/8 Fengguang Wu :
> > Hi Vegard,
> >
> > This warning code is triggered for the attached config:
> >
> > __lockdep_trace_alloc():
> > /*
> > * Oi! Can't be having __GFP_FS allocations with IRQs disabled.
> > */
> > if
2012/7/9 David Rientjes :
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
>> index 8c691fa..5d41cad 100644
>> --- a/mm/slub.c
>> +++ b/mm/slub.c
>> @@ -1324,8 +1324,14 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct
>> kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
>>
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
> The correct fix is what I proposed at
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133754837703630 and was awaiting
> testing. If Rus, Steven, or Fengguang could test this then we could add
> it as a stable backport as well.
Looks good to me. Care to send it
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 04:01:44PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > index 8c691fa..5d41cad 100644
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -1324,8 +1324,14 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct
> > kmem_c
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 8c691fa..5d41cad 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1324,8 +1324,14 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct
> kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
> && !(s->flags & (SLAB_NOTRACK
2012/7/8 Fengguang Wu :
> Hi Vegard,
>
> This warning code is triggered for the attached config:
>
> __lockdep_trace_alloc():
> /*
> * Oi! Can't be having __GFP_FS allocations with IRQs disabled.
> */
> if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(irqs_disabled_flags(flags)))
>
6 matches
Mail list logo