AW: WG: 2.4 on COMPQ Proliant

2001-03-30 Thread Butter, Frank
Hi, I solved the SCSI problem now - thanks for the hint to take sym53c8xx instead of ncr53c8xx. For the SMP-Problem it helped to use an option offerd at boot time: "Press F9 to select different operating system". Before I used "Minimum Configuration...", because Linux wasn't listed. After I've

Re: WG: 2.4 on COMPQ Proliant

2001-03-30 Thread André
Em Quinta 29 Março 2001 20:02, Mr. James W. Laferriere escreveu: > Hello Frank , Highly recommend the sym53c* . JimL > > On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Butter, Frank wrote: > > 2.2.16 claimes to find a ncr53c1510D-chipset, supported by > > the driver ncr53c8xx. Which kernel-param would be the correct

Re: WG: 2.4 on COMPQ Proliant

2001-03-29 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello Frank , Highly recommend the sym53c* . JimL On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Butter, Frank wrote: > 2.2.16 claimes to find a ncr53c1510D-chipset, supported by > the driver ncr53c8xx. Which kernel-param would be the correct one for this? > Frank > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > V

Re: WG: 2.4 on COMPQ Proliant

2001-03-29 Thread Gérard Roudier
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Butter, Frank wrote: > 2.2.16 claimes to find a ncr53c1510D-chipset, supported by > the driver ncr53c8xx. Which kernel-param would be the correct one for this? There is no specific kernel option apart configuring the NCR53C8XX and/or the SYM53C8XX driver. (And not the 53c7

WG: 2.4 on COMPQ Proliant

2001-03-29 Thread Butter, Frank
2.2.16 claimes to find a ncr53c1510D-chipset, supported by the driver ncr53c8xx. Which kernel-param would be the correct one for this? Frank > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Butter, Frank > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. März 2001 17:11 > An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Betreff: 2.4 on COMPQ Pr