Hi Martin.
Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 02 Januar 2008 schrieb Nigel Cunningham:
>> Hi.
>
> Hi,
>
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:54:18AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham
wrote:
>> I would also like
Hi.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:54:18AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
I would also like the TuxOnIce issues related to drivers, ACPI, etc. to go
to
one of the kernel-related lists, but I think
Theodore Tso wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:54:18AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
I would also like the TuxOnIce issues related to drivers, ACPI, etc. to go to
one of the kernel-related lists, but I think linux-pm may be better for that
due to the much lower traffic.
I guess that makes
Hi Nigel,
I do agree with all your plans ;)
I'm also happy with the current version of tuxonice.
The main question is :
"What is the status of merging into mainline" (with or without any
additional patch from other suspend patch).
I have seen quite a lot of mails about this topic on the lmkl
Hi Nigel,
I do agree with all your plans ;)
I'm also happy with the current version of tuxonice.
The main question is :
What is the status of merging into mainline (with or without any
additional patch from other suspend patch).
I have seen quite a lot of mails about this topic on the lmkl in
Theodore Tso wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:54:18AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
I would also like the TuxOnIce issues related to drivers, ACPI, etc. to go to
one of the kernel-related lists, but I think linux-pm may be better for that
due to the much lower traffic.
I guess that makes
Hi.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:54:18AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
I would also like the TuxOnIce issues related to drivers, ACPI, etc. to go
to
one of the kernel-related lists, but I think linux-pm may be
Hi Martin.
Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Mittwoch 02 Januar 2008 schrieb Nigel Cunningham:
Hi.
Hi,
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:54:18AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham
wrote:
I would also like the TuxOnIce issues
Hi Ted.
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:54:18AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>>> I would also like the TuxOnIce issues related to drivers, ACPI, etc. to go
>>> to
>>> one of the kernel-related lists, but I think linux-pm may be better for that
>>> due to the much lower
Hi.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 of January 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>> Hi all.
>
> Hi Nigel,
Gidday :)
>> With the start of a new year, I suppose it's a good time to think about
>> what I'd like to do with TuxOnIce this year and see what feedback I get.
>>
>> First up, I'm
On Tuesday 01 January 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Third, regarding the patch itself, I'm taking my time in working towards
> the 3.0 release. We don't have any major bugs with 3.0-rc3 reported [...].
Well, I think I still have a bug, though it is possibly a mainline problem and
it's not a
On Tuesday, 1 of January 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi all.
Hi Nigel,
> With the start of a new year, I suppose it's a good time to think about
> what I'd like to do with TuxOnIce this year and see what feedback I get.
>
> First up, I'm thinking about closing the mailing lists and asking
Hi all.
With the start of a new year, I suppose it's a good time to think about
what I'd like to do with TuxOnIce this year and see what feedback I get.
First up, I'm thinking about closing the mailing lists and asking people
to use LKML instead for reporting issues and so on. I'm thinking about
Hi all.
With the start of a new year, I suppose it's a good time to think about
what I'd like to do with TuxOnIce this year and see what feedback I get.
First up, I'm thinking about closing the mailing lists and asking people
to use LKML instead for reporting issues and so on. I'm thinking about
On Tuesday, 1 of January 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi all.
Hi Nigel,
With the start of a new year, I suppose it's a good time to think about
what I'd like to do with TuxOnIce this year and see what feedback I get.
First up, I'm thinking about closing the mailing lists and asking people
On Tuesday 01 January 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Third, regarding the patch itself, I'm taking my time in working towards
the 3.0 release. We don't have any major bugs with 3.0-rc3 reported [...].
Well, I think I still have a bug, though it is possibly a mainline problem and
it's not a
Hi.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 of January 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi all.
Hi Nigel,
Gidday :)
With the start of a new year, I suppose it's a good time to think about
what I'd like to do with TuxOnIce this year and see what feedback I get.
First up, I'm thinking about
Hi Ted.
Theodore Tso wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:54:18AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
I would also like the TuxOnIce issues related to drivers, ACPI, etc. to go
to
one of the kernel-related lists, but I think linux-pm may be better for that
due to the much lower traffic.
I guess
18 matches
Mail list logo
