Folks,
I won't try and invent a patch(1) for this, but might I suggest changing:
md: serializing resync, md%d has shares one or more physical units with
md%d!\n
to
md: serializing resync, md%d shares one or more disk drives with md%d.
Array performance may suffer.\n
Regards,
Ruth
Linus, Ingo:
the attached patch, modifies a warning message in md.c which seems to
often cause confusion - the following email includes one example
there-of (there have been others over the months).
Hopefully the new text is clearer.
(patch against 2.4.0-test11-pre7)
NeilBrown
On Sunda
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 03:39:43AM -0800, George Garvey wrote:
> Is this something to be concerned about? It sounds like a disaster waiting
> to happen from the message. This is on 2 systems (with similar disk setups
> [same other than size]).
> Nov 18 16:31:02 mwg kernel: md: serializing resync,
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 03:39:43AM -0800, George Garvey wrote:
> Is this something to be concerned about? It sounds like a disaster waiting
> to happen from the message. This is on 2 systems (with similar disk setups
> [same other than size]).
Nothing to worry. (I got worried also when I
Is this something to be concerned about? It sounds like a disaster waiting
to happen from the message. This is on 2 systems (with similar disk setups
[same other than size]).
dmesg from bootup:
Nov 18 16:31:01 mwg kernel: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MAX_REAL=12
Nov 18 16:31:01 mwg kerne
5 matches
Mail list logo
