On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 05:32:39PM +0100, I wrote:
> I wrote a little palm app some time ago that can capture serial
> console output. If anyone is interested I'll build a tar ball with
> sources and binary.
It is now availiable at http://www.mathematik.uni-ulm.de/~ehrhardt/serial/
Sorry for
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 05:32:39PM +0100, I wrote:
I wrote a little palm app some time ago that can capture serial
console output. If anyone is interested I'll build a tar ball with
sources and binary.
It is now availiable at http://www.mathematik.uni-ulm.de/~ehrhardt/serial/
Sorry for the
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 07:13:29PM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> Considering this is an enterprise-server, you should have a serial-console
> to it; this will allow you to log all error-messages. Alternatively
> (not as nice, though), is to connect a printer to the parallel-port and
> use the
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 07:13:29PM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
Considering this is an enterprise-server, you should have a serial-console
to it; this will allow you to log all error-messages. Alternatively
(not as nice, though), is to connect a printer to the parallel-port and
use the
> Alan> driver. Also did you build the DAC960 support with gcc 2.96-x x<74 ?
> My system compiler is:
>gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
> Shoud I upgrade it to gcc 2.95.x or 2.96.x?
No that one is fine. I have a known problem with DAC960 and cvs gcc or
gcc 2.96.x
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 08:01:48PM +0200, Andriy Korud wrote:
> Alan> What is the oops data before the kernel panic. I need that to debug the
> Alan> driver. Also did you build the DAC960 support with gcc 2.96-x x<74 ?
> My system compiler is:
>gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux
Alan> What is the oops data before the kernel panic. I need that to debug the
Alan> driver. Also did you build the DAC960 support with gcc 2.96-x x<74 ?
My system compiler is:
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
Shoud I upgrade it to gcc 2.95.x or 2.96.x?
And since my
> I've installed 2.4.x there. Just immedualtely I've noticed performance
> improve, responce time improve.
That is good news
> BUT: All kernels prior to 2.1.4-ac8 hangs during first few hours of
> work on heavy disk (Mylex) activity.
Ok Im glad to know we have made some progress there
>
Hello all,
I'd like to post here me experience of using new Linux kernels both at
home and on enterprise server.
At home I'm using new branch since 2.3.x - it works really fine for
home work, multimedia, etc. Nice work, thanks.
But on our enterprise server It's something awful.
Server hardware
Hello all,
I'd like to post here me experience of using new Linux kernels both at
home and on enterprise server.
At home I'm using new branch since 2.3.x - it works really fine for
home work, multimedia, etc. Nice work, thanks.
But on our enterprise server It's something awful.
Server hardware
I've installed 2.4.x there. Just immedualtely I've noticed performance
improve, responce time improve.
That is good news
BUT: All kernels prior to 2.1.4-ac8 hangs during first few hours of
work on heavy disk (Mylex) activity.
Ok Im glad to know we have made some progress there
2.1.4-ac8
Alan What is the oops data before the kernel panic. I need that to debug the
Alan driver. Also did you build the DAC960 support with gcc 2.96-x x74 ?
My system compiler is:
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
Shoud I upgrade it to gcc 2.95.x or 2.96.x?
And since my
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 08:01:48PM +0200, Andriy Korud wrote:
Alan What is the oops data before the kernel panic. I need that to debug the
Alan driver. Also did you build the DAC960 support with gcc 2.96-x x74 ?
My system compiler is:
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2
Alan driver. Also did you build the DAC960 support with gcc 2.96-x x74 ?
My system compiler is:
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
Shoud I upgrade it to gcc 2.95.x or 2.96.x?
No that one is fine. I have a known problem with DAC960 and cvs gcc or
gcc 2.96.x x74
14 matches
Mail list logo