On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:37:03PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:50:37PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:20:55AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:39:57AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > Hello,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:50:37PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:20:55AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:39:57AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Hello, Frederic,
> > >
> > > Just realized that I could further decrease RT latency
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:50:37PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:20:55AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:39:57AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Hello, Frederic,
Just realized that I could further decrease RT latency of one of my
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:37:03PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:50:37PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:20:55AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:39:57AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Hello, Frederic,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:20:55AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:39:57AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello, Frederic,
> >
> > Just realized that I could further decrease RT latency of one of my "shut
> > up RCU on NO_HZ_FULL CPUs" patches if I relied on CPU
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:39:57AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello, Frederic,
>
> Just realized that I could further decrease RT latency of one of my "shut
> up RCU on NO_HZ_FULL CPUs" patches if I relied on CPU 0 always having
> a scheduling-clock tick unless the entire system is idle.
Hello, Frederic,
Just realized that I could further decrease RT latency of one of my "shut
up RCU on NO_HZ_FULL CPUs" patches if I relied on CPU 0 always having
a scheduling-clock tick unless the entire system is idle. The trick
is that I could then rely on CPU 0 to detect RCU CPU stall
Hello, Frederic,
Just realized that I could further decrease RT latency of one of my shut
up RCU on NO_HZ_FULL CPUs patches if I relied on CPU 0 always having
a scheduling-clock tick unless the entire system is idle. The trick
is that I could then rely on CPU 0 to detect RCU CPU stall warnings,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:39:57AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Hello, Frederic,
Just realized that I could further decrease RT latency of one of my shut
up RCU on NO_HZ_FULL CPUs patches if I relied on CPU 0 always having
a scheduling-clock tick unless the entire system is idle. The
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:20:55AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:39:57AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Hello, Frederic,
Just realized that I could further decrease RT latency of one of my shut
up RCU on NO_HZ_FULL CPUs patches if I relied on CPU 0 always
10 matches
Mail list logo