Re: WireGuard Upstreaming Roadmap (November 2017)

2017-12-08 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Hi Dave, On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:38 PM, David Miller wrote: > Sorry, you cannot force the discussion of a feature which will be submitted > upstream to occur on a private mailing list. > > It is _ABSOLUTELY_ appropriate to discss this on netdev since it is the > netdev

Re: WireGuard Upstreaming Roadmap (November 2017)

2017-12-08 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Hi Dave, On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 4:38 PM, David Miller wrote: > Sorry, you cannot force the discussion of a feature which will be submitted > upstream to occur on a private mailing list. > > It is _ABSOLUTELY_ appropriate to discss this on netdev since it is the > netdev community which must

Re: WireGuard Upstreaming Roadmap (November 2017)

2017-12-08 Thread David Miller
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 03:17:40 +0100 > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Tatschner > wrote: >> I have a question which is related to the involved crypto. As far as I >> have understood the protocol and the concept of

Re: WireGuard Upstreaming Roadmap (November 2017)

2017-12-08 Thread David Miller
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 03:17:40 +0100 > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Tatschner > wrote: >> I have a question which is related to the involved crypto. As far as I >> have understood the protocol and the concept of wireguard >> What's your opinion on this? >

Re: WireGuard Upstreaming Roadmap (November 2017)

2017-12-07 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Tatschner wrote: > I have a question which is related to the involved crypto. As far as I > have understood the protocol and the concept of wireguard > What's your opinion on this? This thread has been picked up on the WireGuard

Re: WireGuard Upstreaming Roadmap (November 2017)

2017-12-07 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Tatschner wrote: > I have a question which is related to the involved crypto. As far as I > have understood the protocol and the concept of wireguard > What's your opinion on this? This thread has been picked up on the WireGuard mailing list, not here.

Re: WireGuard Upstreaming Roadmap (November 2017)

2017-12-07 Thread Stefan Tatschner
Hi Jason, thanks for providing all these information. I am looking forward to the further development of wireguard! On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > The current biggest blocker is issues with the crypto API. Before WireGuard > can go upstream, I

Re: WireGuard Upstreaming Roadmap (November 2017)

2017-12-07 Thread Stefan Tatschner
Hi Jason, thanks for providing all these information. I am looking forward to the further development of wireguard! On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > The current biggest blocker is issues with the crypto API. Before WireGuard > can go upstream, I intend to embark on a

WireGuard Upstreaming Roadmap (November 2017)

2017-11-10 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Hi folks, This relates to WireGuard [0]. Following a very nice conference with the Linux kernel networking subsystem community [1,2], I thought it might be a good idea to spell out the roadmap for the coming months and the trajectory into upstream, based on my discussions with several developers

WireGuard Upstreaming Roadmap (November 2017)

2017-11-10 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Hi folks, This relates to WireGuard [0]. Following a very nice conference with the Linux kernel networking subsystem community [1,2], I thought it might be a good idea to spell out the roadmap for the coming months and the trajectory into upstream, based on my discussions with several developers